Night And Maus Analysis

840 Words4 Pages
The barren remains of Auschwitz protrude from the beautiful southern Polish landscape as if a crack in a window— noticeably out of place, and distasteful yet still a part of pane. For many it is a looming omen left by a time rather not remembered, however, for others it stands as a reminder to never forget and to learn. Among those who choose to commemorate the victims are Elie Wiesel and Art Spiegelman. Wiesel was a Romanian Jew who, at the age of fifteen, survived Auschwitz and Buna. In the years following the Second World War, Wiesel wrote a memoir of sorts on his experiences. In contrast with the traditional novel approach, Spiegelman wrote a graphic novel about his father, Vladek Spiegelman, a Pole who survived a German prisoner of war…show more content…
Wiesel tells his story in the first person, which allows the audience to understand his thoughts and emotions greater, as we experience the novel through him. This is evident when Wiesel “felt guilty” for thinking that he “ought to be having two rations of bread, two rations of soup,” instead of just one when his father is dying of dysentery. In Maus, however, such emotions would not be evident unless explicitly stated by Vladek in the story (Wiesel 105). Vladek recalls himself irritating a cut in an attempt to go the the infirmary, where the conditions were significantly better than in the work camp, and claims he “got afraid for [his] hand and let it heal” (Spiegelman 252). If it were not for this direct statement, it would be difficult for the audience to understand what Vladek is thinking. Furthermore, the way in which each other delivers their story are…show more content…
Night follows the more traditional approach of Wiesel recalling the events of a period in his life, while Maus alternates between the ‘modern’ day (modern as in the time when Art Spiegelman is interviewing his father) and Vladek’s story, as told through flashbacks. Wiesel takes us through chronologically, starting when Wiesel “was twelve” (Wiesel 1), through until he “had arrived at Buchenwald” (Wiesel 98) until the liberation when he stared at himself in the mirror, but “a corpse gazed back” (Wiesel 109). This style of writing allows for the audience to follow through with Wiesel at a steady pace with little to no confusion regarding setting at any given moment in the novel. On the other hand, Maus’s style is closer to someone telling a story. The audience learns as much as is known by Art Spiegelman of Vladek’s story, while still strongly emphasizing a major subplot of Vladek’s relationship with people in the modern day. This unusual writing style proves to confuse the audience when panels change between the past and present, but allows us to see a greater amount of flaws in Vladek. It feels real. He is human and imperfect, which is shown in his distasteful relationship with his son and wife. All in all, both styles
Open Document