In 1928, Joseph Stalin became one of the world’s most contentious leaders. During the period that Stalin was in control of mother Russia, he transformed the Soviet Union into a modern super power. He used certain methods to change Russia. He did this by modernizing the Russian economy with his Five Year Plans. He also increased industrial and agricultural production with his policy of collectivization.
In fact, Wiebe argues that this change is so rapid and reaches so many facets of society that it leaves the country in a state of confusion, doubt, and unsureness about itself and the coming future. Wiebe's presentation is more than just to follow the general development of disorder, but to track the underlying current or theme that connected this whole period of change and gave it unity. Wiebe argues that after Reconstruction, the United States was a country consisting of isolated, distended 'island communities' that had to face the rapid changes of industrialization, urbanization, and immigration. Throughout these circumstances different solutions come from diverging movements, groups, and people; some chose to hold on desperately to past values of political and economic modes, some tried to formulate idealistic solutions that were denying the complexity of the challenges they tried to solve, and others looked to force and power to enforce to enforce stability. But in the end it was the rising middle-class and their values of bureaucratic control, rationality, and scientific management that prevailed over the outdated mode of production and value system.
Using material from the Item and elsewhere, assess the view that media imperialism threatens ‘the cultural identities of many countries’. Media imperialism is the view that news is dominated by the West; as the media is linked to politics because of the benefits of capitalism, the effects of the media is threatening cultural identities with this same lifestyle which theorists such as Marxists disagree with. How media imperialism is threatening, what it is doing to threaten cultural identities and the effects of it need to be looked at to assess this matter properly. First of all it is how the Media imperialism is threatening cultural identities in other countries that is important to assess. The dominance and power of the west is affecting cultures.
When the government is involved, a nation can reach its full potential, but without government control, societies are destined for corruption. Without having rules and regulations that the government sets, a capitalist society would quickly become overrun with greed, which would eventually lead to destruction. This has been demonstrated by the stock market crash. In the 1920’s, American capitalists had complete freedom and no regulations to follow. The strength of the economy encouraged Americans to take out more loans and buy more stocks, making them susceptible to future changes in the economy.
Radicals believe that capitalist profit from consumers, who are being exploited. In relation to the bill, radicals would say it’s the capitalist who are destroying the environment and disregarding human presence all in the name of profits. Radicals would approve of the bill as it would put an end to exploitation. But it does not completely comply with their views. A radical solution doe not exist in a capitalist society, but can only work if capitalism no longer existed.
Assess the usefulness of Marxist approaches to an understanding of crime and deviance in contemporary society Marxist criminologists argue that the state passes laws which support ruling-class interests, and maintain its control and power over the subject class. They put forward the view that laws do not reflect value consensus, but instead reflect the values of ruling class ideology. Therefore, laws work towards false class consciousness, as laws only benefit the ruling minority. Many Marxists also argue that there are a vast number of laws protecting property, and Snider (1993) argued the state is often reluctant to pass laws which might threaten profitability. She also argued capitalist states often pour large amounts of money into attracting business; for example offering new investors tax concessions and grants.
When the government prevents prices from adjusting naturally to supply and demand, efficiency is improved in the economy. ANSWER: F TYPE: T KEY1: D SECTION: 2 OBJECTIVE: 7 RANDOM: Y [cxviii]. A market economy cannot possibly produce a socially desirable outcome because individuals are motivated by their own selfish interests. ANSWER: F TYPE: T KEY1: D SECTION: 2 OBJECTIVE: 7 RANDOM: Y [cxix]. While the invisible hand cannot guarantee efficiency, it is better at guaranteeing equity.
It would be a fair statement to make that although Great Britain had big enough threats and factors for revolution to actually happen, the threat lacked a certain spark that could have ignited the revolution, spreading into a full-blown fire across the whole country, helping end the monarchy. The first key point to look at is the nature of British society at the time. The economy and living conditions can always be catalysts for a revolution- an example is the sorry state of the French economy, one of the major causes of revolution breaking out there, just before they went into revolution. Now, had the economy of Britain in the 1790’s been as crippled as France’s was, then it would have been likely that people in Great Britain would have been feeling desperate for change, and a revolutionary would have been looking likely. However, this was not the case.
In others, theories about public works and, eventually, the Keynesian - bombastically titled "general" - framework became popular, rationalizing the permanent increases in governments' roles in raising and allocating capital. At the same time, "crime" took ominous "national and racist" meanings in some countries - Germany was the most prominent - with the new theories "justifying" confiscation of capital, be it from "foreigners" or groups made "foreigners" by novel theorizing. Neither the new rationalizations of Greece's Golden Dawn party, the Catalans' and Scots' wishes to secede, nor the many other parties emerging across Europe along its older "tribal" lines should come as a surprise: it has all happened before - although it might come as a surprise to link them to grave monetary mistakes, drastic expansions of credit, and lack of international
So as a result of their oil being sold in bulk, their economy becomes unbalanced and the population is split into two very different types of people. This is the effect of the Dependency theory, where more powerful countries exploit the poorer ones and keep them underdeveloped so they can keep on doing it. The next theory is the World systems theory, which differs from the Dependency theory as it lacks the rigidity, suggesting that countries do not stay