Meletus vs Socrates

351 Words2 Pages
In Plato’s Apology, Socrates is given the opportunity to defend himself against charges for corrupting the youth and impiety. He chooses to cross examine Meletus, an accuser of his, in order to display the absurdity of the court’s claims against him. Unfortunately, Meletus falls victim to Socrates’ dialectical inquiry and is unable to answer in a way that is beneficial to his argument. Meletus could have done a better job responding to Socrates’ questions if he were to unveil the fallacies prevalent in Socrates’ explanation for his wrongdoings. Socrates retorts Meletus’ statement that he corrupts the youth by first discrediting Meletus. Meletus is asked, by Socrates, to describe who improves the youth of Athens and does not answer as quickly as Socrates allows. Socrates manipulates this moment and uses it as a tool to bolster his argument, claiming that Meletus does not actually care for the wellbeing of Athens’ youth. At his point, Meletus should have pointed out that there is no exact correlation between caring for the youth and his inability to answer quickly. However, Meletus failed to do this. Thus making himself look foolish and strengthening Socrates’ credibility. Moreover, Socrates states that he is not corrupting the youth on the premise that evil begets evil. In Socrates’ eyes, if he were to voluntarily corrupt the youth, the victims of his teachings would harm him in return. Although Socrates makes this seem rational, Meletus should have capitalized on the fact that Socrates’ reasoning is centered on a fallacy. Meletus should have countered with the idea that of course Socrates’ followers would not go against them because they are just that, his followers. In regards to Socrates’ impiety, Meletus should have not accused him of being an atheist, but instead of straying from the conventional belief held in Athens concerning religion. Socrates believes in
Open Document