Blocks Attorney client privilege excludes reliable evidence. Had attorney client privileges not been in place the client would never have told the outright truth to his attorney anyway because they would know that whatever they tell their lawyer could be used to incriminate them in the court of law. It is better that the defendant is allowed to communicate with his attorney in private as to be properly represented and thus make the trial just and fair. Truth seeking is vital to prevent convicting the innocent In the case where the defendant is in fact, innocent the trials in both resolutions would have the same result, and thus reach the same conclusion. The only difference is when the defendant is guilty, meaning that this point
Especially we need to recognize that the Internet is a public environment everyone has access to. As Justice Samuel Alito, Jr. argued, “Protecting this kind of Internet speech posed ‘a very grave threat of domestic violence” (Denniston). Elonis’ case is definitely different from Virginia v. Black in 2003 because burning a cross does not show a clear message and only involves a limited amount of people, but Elonis’ words online can speak clearly that he would do something and convey to a much wider audience, making them fear and nervous. If everyone is free to speak any violence word as Elonis did online, the society will be in completely chaos. Everyone will live in fear because saying terrorism is all right.
Unethical Police Operations In recent years, police action became the view of the world, and in public eye. Every citizen within the U.S is not only worrying about protecting themselves and their family from criminals, but also keeps their eyes on an officer who supposed to serve and protect our citizen daily. This paper will discuss the use of firearms and a receipt of private information, which will also include the discussion of how citizens’ has the right to take advantage of by our policemen. Because of the entire significant differential, all citizenship must take action upon them to affirmative from physical brutality; information abused, and rights violations. Every conflict has its significant implications on administrative and departmental officer procedures.
Dont get me started on red tape Don’t get me started on red tape! When did the bureaucrats take over? And why has every organisation and large company turned into a collection of bureauracats. Our world has become a sea of bureaucracy and lack of common sense. The Banks, the local authority and even the mobile phone companies have all adopted the same bureaucratic stance and use the same tactics to bully us into submission on a daily basis.
It is true that he could not control it, but when he knew it was wrong he should have went for help. He still went to jail, but his sentence was lighter. With help, he could have gotten an early diagnosis and medication. While having zero libido is something very few, if anyone, would want, it beats out a crazily overactive libido that results in illegality and jail time. 2.
He lives up to this label with his current scandal involving him calling a female law student from Georgetown University a “slut” on his radio program. This along with the fact that he is somewhat famous makes Limbaugh newsworthy because people are always interested in something dramatic. If Limbaugh says something to offend someone, people will want to hear about to see “what did he say this time” or “someone said that on the radio?” This is the reason why the story has grown so rapidly. People are interested in controversy; on one hand it excites feminist and others who support Sandra Fluke. On the other it prompts people to realize and defend the fact that we are constitutionally protected to say what we want.
Also it gives ordinary citizens an important role on oversight in the judicial branch. This is not equal or fair due to the fact that the law definition of ordinary is; a person, mainly a judge exercising authority by virtue of office and not by delegation. Also document C states those who serve the jury receive benefits and so does the cases that appears before it and democracy itself. Therefore how does someone who doesn’t believe in democracy be considered to have equal rights is the jury system is what is used. That’s another reason why the American jury system is not a good idea.
In America, standard laws are usually common sense. Some examples are: no committing murder, no stealing, and unlawful drug possession. Even though many of those might be tempting and easy to break, I below that those laws are fair. Many, if not most, laws are meant to keep people controlled and safe. However, in Nightjohn, it was illegal for African Americans to be able to read or write.
This was a case that would warrant such relief in my opinion. Would a jury have chosen to do so? Who knows? I think the fact that jurors should not be able to decide weather a sentence is too harsh because they have no legal training is a valid, what sentence isn’t harsh. Any amount of time away from your family and friends in harsh in my opinion, but isn’t that the reason why we have prison to isolate prisoners so that they will be reformed by missing the outside world.
Sometimes, the insanity defense is the only way a criminal defendant can avoid tough punishments. However, it isn't allowed all the time and it isn't necessarily a better