Critical Analysis Of The Diamond Necklace

1290 Words6 Pages
Maupassant's '' The Diamond Necklace" A Marxist Analysis The story of Guy de Maupassant ' The Diamond Necklace' in brief is about an unjust society where Matilda and her husband Pierre Loisel live, suffering from poverty being from the lower class. In contradistinction with her husband, Matilda looks at the world with greedy eyes, considering herself an unlucky woman who deserves much better life. After her husband got two invitations to the Ministry of Public Instruction party, she compels to borrow a diamond necklace from Jeanne Forestier, a wealthy friend of Matilda's, in order to have an appearance that matches her wishes .At the party and for the first time in her life Matilda feels that her society is noticing her as if she was invisible…show more content…
Most of people try hard to look better than who they are to make others believe that they are not less than them, as well as to gain social power. It's what pushes them to deceive and manipulate others. It starts with Pierre Loisel when he gets the invitations of the Ministry of Public Instruction party, where the attendants will be all from the upper class, still Pierre was able to attend by mean of deception. Matilda also did not want to appear as she is at the party. Buying a dress that her husband can hardly afford and borrowing a diamond necklace from her friend to look more attractive and wealthy. By doing so, Matilda successfully deceived the bourgeoisie by appearance. However, manipulation in the story is not performed by the powerless people only but vice versa as well. Jeanne had tricked her friend Matilda by not telling her that the necklace was fake, not only that but having a fake necklace reveals that Jeanne, who is already wealthy was trying to look wealthier in front of the society. The characters of the story were seeking for better social possessions as it's
Open Document