Man Is Inherently Evil

1364 Words6 Pages
The Evil In Humanity Maxine Fine The debate whether man is good or evil has been argued for centuries and is still in dispute today. Psychologists have spent lifetimes developing theories to prove or disprove each side of the argument. John Locke was a psychologist who believed man was born “tabula rasa”, or a “clean state”. He was one of many who thought man was a sponge, absorbing his environment and for the most part, inherently good. The goodness in mankind can be seen in people’s willingness to care for others in their societies. Charities, for instance, truly bring out the good in man. In fact, some may say that giving without knowing who is receiving is one of the best ways to donate. The acts of generosity shown with charity prove the goodness in man. Individuals and organizations show selflessness through the ways they interact and help society. Mother Theresa and The Red Cross are evidence of this. Although many would agree with Locke’s theory that man is good, others view the world with a more tainted perspective. Thomas Hobbes and Sigmund Freud are two psychologists who theorized that man is inherently evil. Freud’s theory states that man is made of three parts: the Id, Ego and Superego. At the core, or the Id, man has nothing but instinctual desires to please himself. The other parts are merely layers to restrain the Id. Hobbes believed that human nature was tainted and that people would resort to immorality when left without order. In Lord of the Flies, William Golding represents society in a group of stranded boys with no authority. The boys turn to savagery and degenerate to self-gratification. Without order, the boys act immorally. Golding agreed with Freud and Hobbes that man was inherently evil. Although Freud and Hobbes only theorized that man was evil, there is clear evidence that supports
Open Document