Machiavelli And Miliband

1083 Words5 Pages
Assessment Dossier Entry 1 – Machiavelli Summary of the article: John Gray’s article in ‘The Guardian’, from 15 July 2011, reviews Ed Miliband’s very first biography, written by Mehdi Hasan and James Macintyre and published in June this year. The author refers not only to the book, but also to the work of the 16th Century, Italian philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli, particularly his concept of ‘virtu’. By drawing the audiences’ attention on some of the key points in Miliband’s career path, included in the reviewed book, Gray is attempting to determine, whether or not the Machiavellian virtues held by him would be enough to praise Fortune and ‘bring Labour Party back to power’ (Gray, 2011). Quote(s) from The Prince: ‘We cannot attribute to fortune or virtue, that which is achieved without either.’ (Machiavelli, Ch. 8) ‘It ought to be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things.’ ( Machiavelli, Ch. 6 ) Critical discussion: Niccolo Machiavelli, one of the prominent minds of the Italian Renaissance, dedicated much of his active lifetime to clarification of the outstanding qualities and surrounding elements of fortune and luck, required for making a man into a successful leader. Skinner (2000, p. 34) argues that the new prince – fortunate enough to be ‘far- seeing and virtuoso’, ought to aim at ‘double glory’, that is, building a stable foundation for his new principality, accompanied with good laws. However, prior to achieving such ends, one needs to prove himself as a courageous, sensible and true ‘vir’ in Fortune’s eyes (Skinner, 2000, p.41), by employing a set of ‘princely’ qualities. Propitiating Fortune is vital, by virtue of Machiavelli’s notion of determinism, where human beings do not have control

More about Machiavelli And Miliband

Open Document