Julius Caesar's Ambition

1015 Words5 Pages
Alex Carney Julius Caesar Jacobs - 2nd Period April 15th, 2011 Ambition Many times in Shakespeare's “Tragedy of Julius Caesar,” Julius Caesar is accused of being ambitious. In fact, it is even the stated reason for his death. Among different interpretations, it is debatable whether or not this is a legitimate accusation. As a leader, Caesar had to do what was right for the good of Rome; however, the conspirators saw his leadership as tyranny. Ambition is used with an extremely negative connotation in Shakespeare's writing, but today, ambition is seen as a good trait for a hardworking person. Everyone carries their own ambitious desires, whether they are good or bad. After Caesar's death, Antony uses Caesar's compassion as an example to “prove” that Caesar wasn't ambitious, saying, “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept; / Ambition should be made of sterner stuff” (JC 3.2.91-2). Antony argues that because of Caesar's compassion, he could not have been an ambitious ruler. He turns compassion into a foil for ambition, therefore making the reader go back to the question of, “What does ambition really mean?” It appears that the real question involves the meaning of ambition in Shakespeare's time. Dictionary.com defines “ambition” as “an earnest desire for some type of achievement or distinction” (Dictionary.com). Ambition is ambiguous when it comes to positive or negative connotations. All we are led to assume from Shakespeare's writings is that ambition causes danger and paranoia. It is a theme of mystery; there is no way to know where it will lead a person. It could lead to tyranny and oppression, or it could lead to growth and prosperity. Caesar refuses the crown three times. Some are led to believe that it is an act of false modesty; Antony sees it as an act of genuine humility, saying, “You all did see that on the Lupercal / I thrice
Open Document