How Far Was the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-5 Responsible for the Outbreak of the 1905 Revolution?

957 Words4 Pages
How far was the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-5 responsible for the outbreak of the 1905 revolution? The Russian Revolution happened because of many reasons and factors including the Russo-Japanese war. The Revolution itself included strikes, peasant uprisings, petitions, riots, demonstrations and assassinations. The Tsar was ‘at war with his own people’ for most of 1905. However, the revolution didn’t remove the Tsar. This is mostly because of several reasons including: The October Manifesto which divided the opponents to the Tsar, the Tsar himself listened to the advice from an able minister Sergei Witte which influenced the October Manifesto, the Army remained mostly loyal and the French granted a loan of money to prop up the economy. Though it was important that the people stood up for themselves. The Russo-Japanese war, we could say, acted like a catalyst for the revolution as it was known as an ‘unnecessary war’; most of the Russian public didn’t want to be at war. The Russians suffered a humiliating defeat which shocked the Russian public. Their aim was to expand its control in the Far East. Between 1904 and 1905, in Northern China and Korea, Russia and Japan came into conflict. Russian defeats on land and at sea showed worrying leadership. In January 1905 the Russian army were forced to surrender their Port Arthur Naval Base. The War caused shortage of food and fuel, high prices and unemployment. Russia’s defeat made the Tsar look ‘weak’ and gave encouragement to the revolutionaries. The Russian people were starting to see the Tsar for who he really was. However, in my opinion, I think that ‘Bloody Sunday’ is a bigger factor that was responsible for the revolution. In January 1905, a large group made up of workers, students priests, women and children peacefully marched in the streets making their way to the Tsar’s palace where they wanted to give him a
Open Document