How Far Do the Sources Agree That the Philosophy of Separate Spheres Implied That Women Were Inferior to Men?

542 Words3 Pages
Victorian family life was completely different to the one we are used to today. There was a more distinct contrast between a man and a woman. For instance, the ideal Victorian woman had to be angelic, obedient, ladylike and silent, but most of all – she had to be a good housewife. Her main role was to make sure the house and children were looked after and that the husband was happy. In addition, it was socially and morally unacceptable for a woman to be unmarried. Victorian women were forced to live by a number of certain rules, however men lived more freely. They were not judged as harshly by society as women. The different male and female roles were referred to as ‘separate spheres’ and women were often perceived as inferior to men. Source 1 states that the gender difference idea was taken from the Bible, as ‘God has’ ‘designed’ men and women to have different roles. This idea has been carried on by people in their everyday lives. It shows that these ideas have been there since the beginning of time, and most importantly – God cannot be wrong, therefore this must be the way of life. Furthermore, source 1 suggests that men have better ‘education and manners’, which portrays women as less intelligent. Similarly, source 3 suggests that women should know their place and not seek for ‘anything higher’. This could be referring to women wanting to be able to voice their opinion by voting or at least having a say in decisions regarding their family, however they were not seen as clever enough to do so. On the other hand, source 1 says that ‘to soften each other’ a man and a woman have to ‘unite’, which could perhaps mean marriage and children. The phrase ‘soften each other’ portrays a couple as equal partners with different, but equally as important, features that make a marriage work. In the same way, source 2 says that because of the differences ‘it is impossible to
Open Document