Hills Like White Elephants

846 Words4 Pages
In "Hills Like White Elephants”: The Jilting Of Jig" Nilofer Hashmi looks at the many different levels of symbolism, the role of the main characters, and the possible outcomes of the story. Hemingway is a great master of symbolism and "Hills Like White Elephants" was not an exception. That is why Hashmi uses the words of other scholars to support his argument. Lanier states, "everything in the story contributes in some way to the meaning" (Hashmi 74). Hashmi continues to look into the symbolism of the title; she also believes that understanding the title will help understand the real meaning of the story. Hashmi also takes a closer look to the characters. She focuses on the supreme role of American and his power over the Jig by analyzing their dialogues. Hashmi comes to conclusion that the right approach to understanding this short story is by taking every object, dialogue, and action as a symbolization of the deeper meaning of the story. Hashmi begins her article by listing the possible outcomes of the story that were considered by scholars: 1. "Jig will have an abortion and stay with the American 2. Jig will have an abortion and leave the American 3. Jig will not have an abortion and in doing so will have won the American to her point of view" (Hashmi 72). And then, she introduces us to the other scholarly interpretation that Hashmi most likely to agree: “the girl will indeed have the abortion. Expecting this way to stay with the man, but after the operation has been performed, he will abandon her” (Hashmi 72). Hashmi tries to define the meaning behind the use of the title "Hills Like White Elephants." For Hashmi the hills "appear to symbolize the glimmering hope, remote yet real like the hills themselves, that her sexual relationship with the man might change the solid relationship of family and permanence" (Hashmi 75). Other scholars in their search for an
Open Document