So, if a flood occurs, everyone in the immediate area would be safe and not just one house. Another view is that it should be the farmers and forestry companies that should pay for the sea defences in this case. This may not be the strongest case as they aren’t solely to blame for causing floods. However, they do assist it a great deal in that they cut down trees which contributes to the risk of flooding and produce negative externalities. In my opinion, they could make a contribution to offset the price of the sea defences for
Surfside Leisurescapes This report is consistent with our signed Academic Integrity Form on file with the instructor Trevor Burns, Amir Kalantar, Colin Brown, Nav Thandi, Adam Jackson Team #1 October 28, 2013 Critical Issues The three primary critical issues that are affecting Surfside Leisurescapes with the greatest impact are: * No structural marketing plan has led competitors to take increasing market share, deterring Surfside’s customer base. * 78% of Hot tub sales occur in 6 months due to season trends, this is decreasing employee morale in slack months * Lack of full product base disregarded large hydrotherapy segment causing customers to shop at nearby competition Surfside Leisurescapes must implement an effective marketing strategy in order to combat against increasing competition and to gain majority market share within an underutilized segment. Their inexperience from the past years of operations has caused the company to be unprepared for new entrants into the market place. The seasonality trends of Hot Tubs has caused the staff of Surfside to have low morale as their job security is low, this could be a deterrent for sales and the staff not exceeding expectations of a push strategy. Analysis Marketing Plan Surfside Leisurescapes has steadily been losing their market share, as they were an established company in a untapped market it lead to new competitors easily entering the market as seen in Exhibit 1.
The listed price was 300 kilograms of solid gold; however, since Captain Jack Sparrow Inc. is anxious to sell its used ships, and since Davey Jones is a very persuasive negotiator, the parties agree to a selling price of 175 kilograms of solid gold. A week later, after the hurricane season had ended, Davey Jones put the ship in the water to see how it sailed. After sailing for ten kilometres, the ship begins to take in excessive amounts of water. As the ship begins to sink, Davey Jones’ crew aboard the Flying Dutchmen arrive just in time to tow Davey Jones and his newly purchased ship ashore and they dock it at Captain Jack Sparrow Inc.’s docking port. What are Davey Jones’ rights under the common law?
Over fishing occurs when there are more fish caught than fish in the ocean to sustain fish stock. Global warming is another big harm to the ocean. Global warming affects all of the earth. Animals are having a hard time surviving because sea levels are rising and ocean temperatures are changing. The sea animal cannot adjust to these changes in the ocean due to global warming.
In the ocean outside each lifeboat swim the poor of the world, who would like to get in, or at least to share some of the wealth.” (Hardin 4, pg 377). Hardin presents his metaphor to show some nations as safe in their wealth and how poor nations would take that from them if they could, with no concern for the well being of the initially secure nations. He uses this to exploit pathos and make the reader fearful that their nation will help poor nations. He implies it will endanger their wealth and security by wasting resources and causing poor nations to just increase their populations. This section is also when Hardin first subtly attempts to personalize his argument.
Summary Norman E. Bowie addresses the issue concerning the responsibility of business as related to the environment. In Bowie’s thesis he states that business “…have a moral obligation to avoid intervening in the political arena in order to defeat or weaken environmental legislation” (516). Bowie explains that business can have a negative effect on the environment by doing things like dumping hazardous waste into lakes. Bowie considers that although this may be looked at by some as being morally ok, the real moral issue is addressed when you take into consideration other factors for example In this case, those people and animals who may swim in the lake and the negative effects this may have on their health. In order for something to become a moral obligation, four truths must hold: capability, need, proximity and last resort.
To end the potential risks associated with keeping orcas in captivity, there must be a decrease in marine park attendance. Restrictions must also be placed on scientific whaling permits. It is up to those who have attended marine parks, seen orca shows, or work with orca whales, to end this disgusting act of slavery. Orca whales will continue to thrive in the oceans, just as humans do on land, as long as territories are respected. We are aliens to them, and we need to retreat our invasion and hope that their species can
Today, as in the past, oceans are being treated as giant disposal areas for all types of refuse (plastics, tins, bottles etc.) with the belief that the enormous size of the oceans would be enough to dilute and break-down any materials we put into them. Most of the waste we produce on land eventually, in one way or another, reaches our oceans, either through deliberate dumping or from run-off through drains and rivers. But, sadly, now we have to reap the ramifications of our choices. With an average of 6.3 million kilograms of trash being pumped into our oceans every year, it won't be very long until they reach breaking point.
Disposal techniques such as burning and using dumpsites only push the environment further down the drain (Logomasini, 1); since such waste disposal methods bring about environmental concerns as well. Governments have recycling directives in place but companies and individuals are still having the liberty to recycle the waste on their own, and this is where the government directives get overlooked. Disposing biodegradable waste is not as challenging as other waste that naturally decomposes leaving organic benefits to the environment. That being the case, therefore, it means that non-biodegradable waste poses a massive challenge to conservation efforts making it essential to come up with an effective and comprehensive recycling mechanism. This exploratory argumentative paper will delve deep into the case of why recycling the non0biodegradeable waste should be made mandatory by the government for all private individuals and corporate entities to comply with.
It is my conviction that pollution is not only traced to industrial waste but also household activities. Therefore, citizens should not hold the government environmentally responsible but share the burden of these issues with their administration. A large amount of garbage scientifically proved to derive more from households, not only form big factories. Take, for instance, the case of marine damages which is in a large degree is due to chemicals without any handling treatment from factories, but household wastes form families and the habit of scattering litter directly into the sea and rivers also contribute to the problem. Hence, simple manners such as putting the garbage into the bins or classifying them into categories are highly evaluated as the contribution to reduce environmental devastation.