Gun Laws: Too Strict or Not Strict Enough

1359 Words6 Pages
Gun Laws: Too Strict or Not Strict Enough? As the U.S. Constitution states “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This statement, created by our fore fathers, has caused a lot of controversy in both political and personal lives across America. “In 2012, Americans owned an estimated 270 million guns, almost 42 percent of the total number of civilian-owned guns on the entire planet.” (Zarracina.) With firearms being so prevalent in this country, it raises many questions regarding the current gun laws, the effect it has on crime in the country, and gun safety. Should current gun laws have more restrictions? Does the current gun legislation have direct correlation with crime rates? Does America’s safety depend on guns? For the past several decades, as gun violence has been more prominent in the media, this controversial question has become a national debate splitting the country in two. Should the U.S. tighten the gun legislations? A Criminal Justice article states “In October 2013, Gallup found that 49 percent of Americans thought gun laws should be more strict, 37 percent thought they were fine as is, and 13 percent thought they were too strict. By comparison, in September 1990, a whopping 78 percent thought they should be more strict, and only 17 percent thought they were good enough; 2 percent thought they were too strict.” (Zarracina.) Although not every citizen may own a firearm or have strong opinion on this matter, this issue affects everyone in the U.S. America was founded on the belief that we have a constitutional right to bear arms. From 1776 to present day, U.S. citizens are permitted to own personal firearms. Current gun regulations permit civilians to own, purchase, and carry various types of firearms, including handguns, shotguns, and semi-automatic rifles. “On Sept. 13, 2004, Congress allowed a 10-year
Open Document