Gender Roles Projected by Science Literature

1515 Words7 Pages
Male and Female gender roles projected by Science Scientific accounts of reproductive biology have accentuated stereotypes about gender in many ways. These discussions are intrinsically influenced by cultural constructs as well as typecasts about males and females. Martin (1991) postulates in her work that the females’ reproductive cycle is a functioning process, however menstruation is a glitch in this process. Menstruation is described as the death of cellular tissue, the wasting away of uterine lining. These texts are constructed in such a way as to emphasize how inefficient the menstrual cycle is. The use of language here reveals a notion of gender bias. While the female is spends time disintegrating tissue the male is replenishing cells. Male superiority is embedded in much of today’s scientific text. An example of this when Martin says the egg is viewed as the damsel in distress, helplessly waiting for her male hero, the sperm. This is analogous to sleeping beauty anticipating the kiss of life. The sperm is perturbed to rescue the egg, to be valiant. We can see how cultural conceptions about passive females and heroic males are infused in to the personality of gametes. The fact that the sperm “penetrates” the egg illustrates how the female is the subordinate male and needs to be molded by the male norm. This has been proved to be erroneous as the sperm does not burrow through the egg but instead is directed by microvilli in to the cell. Contrary to being dormant, research has proved that both the egg and the sperm are equally participating parties in the formation of a zygote. The activity of gametes bequeaths gender personalities. Female docility opposed to male activity, rigor and mobility. This is show by how the sperm “swims” to the egg or how the egg is produced and awaits the infiltration from the sperm from production. But sperm do not swim
Open Document