Functionalists vs Feminist View on Family

803 Words4 Pages
Functionalists, believes that society works like the human body. The human body has vital organs in order to work, whereas society has vital institutions, such as the family. Functionalists believe that the family works independently with others in society and that the nuclear family meets some of society's functional rules. Above all the family contributes to social solidarity, the need to function as a collective, it does this by promoting the collective conscience, the realization that there is something bigger and more worthwhile than the individual and that individuals must sacrifice their selfish desires for the good of the collective, and the value consensus, an agreement on shared norms and values. Alternatively, there are Marxists, such as Karl Marx, that believe that institutions are creating by the ruling class in order to control the working class. Marxists believe that the functions of the family are performed purely for the benefit of the ruling class. This view contrasts sharply with the functionalist view that the family benefits both society as a whole and the individual members of the family. Some Functionalists, such as Murdock, argue that there are 4 functions of the family that only the nuclear family can teach. Teaching of sexuality and gender roles, Murdock says that the nuclear family teaches people to express sexuality in a socially approved context, it teaches that heterosexuality is the norm and that other types of relationships are 'abnormal' eg. adultery, homosexuality, incest. Reproduction, Murdock argues that the nuclear family ensures reproduction and a stable environment to rear children. Primary socialization, Murdock says that the nuclear family provides primary socialization - it is through this that they are 'groomed' into society's value consensus and collective conscience. Economic security, Murdock says that the nuclear
Open Document