Fahrenheit 9/11 Analysis

759 Words4 Pages
Ivan Lopez Karen Rasmussen COMM 301 November 23, 2012 Fahrenheit 9/11 In 2004 Michael Moore released his highly anticipated documentary film titled Fahrenheit 9/11. The title is a play on “Fahrenheit 451,” the temperature at which paper burns, and a novel by Ray Bradbury about a future totalitarian state in which reading and independent thought are forbidden. The documentary film closely examines the war on terror, the Bush presidency, and how they were portrayed by the media. The film starts off by questioning the accuracy of the 2001 election that resulted in George W. Bush winning the election. Fahrenheit 9/11 is the highest grossing documentary film of all time. Fahrenheit 9/11 presents evidence against the Bush administration, and brings to light the governmental corruption and lack of information/wrong information presented by former president George W. Bush and his staff at the time of the September 11th attacks. The 9/11 terrorisms attacks, ultimately lead up to America invading Iraq. Throughout most of the film, Moore Criticizes the way the Bush administration handled the terrorists attacks of September 11,…show more content…
When it comes to selecting an artifact, almost any artifact will work for a pentadic analysis. Next is analyzing the artifact, this has two parts within itself which are; labeling the five terms of the pentad and applying the ratios to the dominant term. Research questions asked by critics using the pentadic method can vary widely unless you know the rhetor’s worldview. After completing the analysis we are able to write the essay using the five major components which are an introduction, a description of the artifact, a description of the method of criticism, a report of the findings of the analysis and discussing the contribution the analysis makes to rhetorical

More about Fahrenheit 9/11 Analysis

Open Document