When investigating an ethical dilemma, ask yourself if any of the principles relate to the case. Once you decide which principle may apply then, you
…he set out again and discovered behind the sign at a parking garage, a plastic Dellwood box…(Transition from looking for boxes to setting up his box home) 5 A. description of boxes B. description of box home C. comparison to “regular” home with couch and coffee table D. plastic bags distributed around him V. He eased himself with slow care onto the stronger box, reached into one of his bags, pulled out a Daily News, and snapped it open against the cardboard table. (Description of Box Man as a regular normal person) 6 A. comparison to commuter and a Wall Street Journal B. folding paper C. respectful with eyes D. That’s just what the Box Man did…(This is the conclusion to the paragraph even though it is set off as its own paragraph. This is done for emphasis to show the normalcy of the Box Man’s life) 7 1. compare to grandmothers 2. tongue to finger VI. One could live like this…(This one sentence is set apart as a paragraph because it is the main point of her essay. She has inserted it here to keep the reader attune to why she is describing the Box Man and to transition into the next piece of the essay which is her
A woman opens the door to look at who it is, but quickly shuts the door again. This is an enigma code as it makes the audience wonder what is going on. The man forces through the door to find the woman crying, the man brings out a detectives badge and asks if she knew anything about the murder of her son. This is an enigma code as we don’t know what has happened to her son and makes the audience eager to hear more. The detective says she should answer so the police force can get closer to finding the origami killer.
Ethics Awareness Inventory . Ethics Awareness Inventory Ethics awareness inventory is an opportunity for individuals to learn about themselves as well as how others approach ethical decision making (The Williams Institute for Ethics and Management, 2012). “Ethics awareness inventory is designed to assist individuals with achieving specific objectives enabling an individual to understand and care about what is right or good, compare, and decide alternatives, form opinions about actions morally appropriate to take, and acquire the skills to justify decisions or ethical grounds” (The Williams Institute for Ethics and Management, 2012, p. 1). Understanding the importance of an individual’s own personal ethical perspective is an important area that individuals should be aware of and understand as well, the relationship between personal and professional ethics are also areas important to be aware of and understand. The ethics awareness inventory consists of four categories of ethical thoughts used to determine the profile of an individual, which should reflect the individual’s beliefs.
Ethics Awareness Inventory Shawaun Cunningham PSY490 April 29, 2013 Jane Northrop Ethics Awareness Inventory Many individuals share different views on ethics, some believe that it is a moral, and immoral behavior, verses right and wrong. However, their views may vary based on beliefs and ethical decisions. To understand the ethical nature of individual’s decisions, would be to take a look at their personality other than passing judgment on their actions. The ethical perspective is based on the characteristics on an individual’s belief and ethical moral values as well as the perspective views that is impacting society today. The code of conduct plays an important role in ethic principals and professional psychology.
Second, it will assist to the understanding and demands of relativism. These are key terms of analysis prior to guiding an individual to the true meaning of ethical relativism. Finally, it will consider the disadvantages and advantages of this philosophical view while emphasizing different points of view of philosophical key leaders. Ethics: Ethical Relativism At first glance, for the unknowledgeable individual, Ethical relativism may sound intriguing, but there is more beyond the external perspective of this philosophical view. In a perfect world, one hopes to experience a well thought-out philosophical view.
Humans who have knowledge of a certain situation tend to understand the implications of every action that men take, thus it is also their responsibility to ensure that their actions are ethical in any way. The knowledge issue question that arises from this assumption is how, if at all, can we determine if knowing something should lead to an ethical responsibility? We can attempt to answer this question by agreeing that possessing knowledge does at times perhaps carry an ethical responsibility using reason, emotion and sense perception as the Ways of Knowing as well as History, and Natural Science as the Areas of Knowledge. Exploring History as well as the Natural Science of biology can be used to back up the claim of how having knowledge carries an ethical responsibility. Moving back in history to the era where The Vietnam War took place in Vietnam.
Consequentialist tell us that it is the consequences of an action that makes the action morally permissible or not (Villanueva, 1994). The two crucial theories under consequentialist are egoism which advocates individual self-interest as its guiding principle and utilitarianism which holds that one must take into account everyone affected by the action. Both these theories agree that rightness and wrongness are the function of an action’s results. Deontologists tell us that it is the person’s intentions in doing an action that makes the action morally permissible or not (Villanueva,1994). For example, a deontologists would hold that for lecturer who is a student’s aunt would give her a high mark for Test One is wrong not simply because the student wrote the test well but because of the inherent character if itself which is nepotism.
Ethical Egoism We will be discussing the strengths and weaknesses of ethical egoism, but before we begin we first must understand what ethical egoism is and what is involved. Ethical egoism is the normative ethical position that moral agents ought to do what is in their own self-interest. It differs from psychological egoism, which claims that people can only act in their self-interest. Ethical egoism also differs from rational egoism, which holds that it is rational to act in one's self-interest. Ethical egoism contrasts with ethical altruism, which holds that moral agents have an obligation to help others.
They also have different attitudes toward borrowing money. Torvald had an illness and was on the edge of death but being the way that he is Nora turns to Krogstad for help. Turning to someone else without approval by her husband is strictly forbidden. This is the start of Nora’s independence, the sacrifice she is willing to take knowing that borrowing money is forbidden. She starts the process to help her husband get better.