Essay On Coalition Government

497 Words2 Pages
What evidence is there to suggest that the new Coalition government is more representative than before? In 2010 a new coalition government was elected into power, it was the first time since 1977 when Labour joined the Lib Dems. The outcome of the 2010 election left no clear majority to any one party in government so it was agreed that David Cameron would be the Prime Minister, with his conservatives, and Nick Clegg would become Deputy to Cameron, with the Liberal Democrats. But many people question as to whether this coalition is a more representative government. The turnout for the 2010 election was 65.1% of the population, compared to the 2005 turnout of only 60%, meaning an increase of 2 million voters. This suggests that the government is more representative of the public as more people expressed their opinions and had a say as to who would run the country. Another reason why it can be seen as more representative is that with two parties in power, two groups of people are having their view, opinions and issues put forward and debated with a higher chance of success. This is opposed to one party having a majority, with one part of the population having their opinions getting across. Arguably, it is the majority…show more content…
In recent cabinet changes Cameron appointed 4 women (Including Lady Warsi who is an ethnic minority) to be in Cabinet and the commons has 27 MPs who are part of an ethnic minority. More and more Women and Ethnic minorities but yet it is still not enough. The ration of women in Parliament to women in the public is not equal, which leave many to believe that women are not being equally represented (The same for Ethnic minorities). The question arises as to whether we should have MPs who reflect the ration of the population, or do we only vote in those who would do the job well, even if it leads to a greater dominance of a certain age, gender and
Open Document