Drama Name: Erin Caulley Subject: Year 11 Drama Teacher: Miss Lodwick Snagged The play Snagged is an Australian play script written by Robert Kronk aimed specifically towards teenagers and any other young person who lives in a small geographically isolated town. The play Snagged gives us, the audience, an insight into what it is like for the teenagers who are faced with a difficult decision. The play starts with Sam, who is the main character throughout the course of the play; she has just graduated school and is on the cusp of adulthood when she is faced with a dilemma. Sam has to choose between leaving a town that could not under anyone’s terms be described as teenage friendly or stay and help her father in the butcher’s shop and not pursue her career as a veterinarian. Things are only made harder for her when Josh moves back to Oxbrook and they become romantically entangled.
The words, garbage, debris, toxins were avoided to give the subject a more pleasant relationship with his body and its byproducts, which are necessary to be formed but need to be eliminated and not to be hated or feared. So the words, impurities, and unwanted waste used. Author prefers the healing light to circulate within the body, than to let it flow out through the feet, and prefers only the impurities to go down that route. The size of the sphere of light expanding to three feet is quite small, and the subject may feel cramped inside causing claustrophobia if susceptible. Therefore it was changed to ‘ a diameter just beyond your arm span’ where there is enough space for each subject to comfortably float in his own custom made space, and be surrounded completely by the healing light.
It could be argued it doesn't really help the patient; it just makes their behavior more acceptable to others. As well patient’s behavior may just be superficial. They might only produce desirable behavior knowing they’re going to receive a token. Showing that token economy isn't
Type your draft here. For some people it doesn’t tend to distract too much. I mean if your in the middle of the class, they make you put it away. But in a normal situation, a person would only take off their headphones and have the capability to interact with people. Although it does depend of the person and the situation, based on what I’ve experienced throughout my life, I have to agree that it can sometimes hamper social interaction.
This is because seating can affect individuals and influence their communication. A negative way that this could affect individuals communication is by having people sitting facing the wall as this would mean no one would want to communicate to each other. This communication barrier could be overcome by rearranging the seats so that people are able to see each other which would help them to want to communicate with one another, this could potentially mean everyone is able to communicate effectively, this would be a form of positive communication that I influenced by seating
I liked how Loor would position seating so that people would be facing only the interior of the building or key spaces like the theater-like space or the pool. He also created a sense of security by allowing everyone who entered to be seen from all parts of the building. When I was reading about Loos’s design techniques and how he directs people’s vision I started thinking about Eyes of the Skin and how Pallasmaa described how our senses work. He does stress that vision is not the most important sense, but this is obviously a major focus of Loor’s design. And it is fascinating how Loor manipulates this sense.
The sound design of this play was good they didn’t use much sound besides the actors and actresses voices. At some points when the scene was coming to an end they used very settle
Freedom of Speech *? * by Daniel Torres Freedom of speech is somewhat of a double edged sword. Why do people promote freedom of speech when they have something to say, yet when they find something supposedly “offensive”, they completely change their mind, and go against it? How is it that people want freedom to say whatever their heart pleases, but they’re always on the lookout to hear something they can feel offended by. I find it disturbing, to not say disgusting, this newly found need of self-entitlement people have now.
If we judge and label someone by appearance, we probably can’t learn special characteristics about someone because we don’t know about their belief and personality in appearance. Some people just hide their emotion and seldom express themselves by a verbal communication. Therefore, the “Squiggling game” is a good form of communication to allow us to know someone without judgment more. 250 words Additional material: Gordon Allport Prejudice jeopardizes to learn special characteristics about someone. As a result, we should find different ways to reduce prejudice.
As in question 2, there could be two different outcomes. Depending on the viewer it can be effective but it could be ineffective as well. It could be affective in that the viewer could get the message of the advert and change their ways and the way they think about alcohol. It could be ineffective as the viewer might not care if that happens to them and some people might think that it won't happen to them as they have done it in the past. This may cause them to then just ignore the advert.