As Cohen, Salazar, and Barkat state, there is an inherent difficulty in categorising documentaries “stiffly”, as each will tend to employ aspects of Nichols’ six groups (2009, 288, 292). However, Forbidden Lie$ can be categorised most accurately into the expository and reflexive models, with attributes of two others. The film shares traits with performative documentary film making, such as “employing the dramatisation and reconstruction of events and personal experiences” (Cohen, Salazar, and Barkat 2009, 300). As Martin describes the reenactment scenes, Broinowski uses “‘dramatic reconstruction’ of Dalia’s tale, [which is] delivered in the juiciest and most sensationalist TV style” (2009). ‘Sensationalist’ is the operative word, as it describes each of the reenactment scenes of Dalia’s murder by her family perfectly.
From the movies we realize that not only knowing the facts but being able to see the facts in as an objective a manner as possible is crucial in enabling us to have a more accurate story of our past. History is very much
Discuss the role of editing in making meaning, with reference to a documentary or fiction film. Your discussion should include close analysis of particular sequences and make use of relevant critical, theoretical or historical texts. To a filmmaker, the importance of editing to create meaning is unique. The ability to manipulate footage allows a whole new domain of creative ideas to become available. “My path leads to the creation of a fresh perception of the world.
Another form of approach to film history has lead to many film historians self publicising themselves, using it as a way to take credit for advancements of early film through various publications. This form of approach, known as the great figures approach looks at the works of individuals mostly so it therefore will have some bias
Because we have to analyze movies, it helps us to understand what the movie is about. Analyzing an entire movie is to divide parts or fundamentals in the direction of to agree on the basics or indispensable features of a motion picture. It also transport elsewhere out of the important essentials within the aspect accordingly at the same time as to recognize causes, key factors, achievable outcome, in addition to provide the real meaning of analyzing a film. Their are many movies, everyone have a favorite movie that they adore, but a lot of citizens do not be acquainted with a great deal of endeavor is position into producing a high-quality film. Clear in our minds everyone do not really see the aspects of the movies that we are watching, nevertheless it plays in the overall of the movie.
Film Theory debates the essence of cinematic value and provides conceptual frameworks for understanding a film’s relationship to reality, the other arts, individual viewers, and society at large. In order to successfully approach film criticism it is important to examine several theories. It is important to keep in mind that, “no critical approach can tell us everything about a film but, rather, different approaches can teach us different things about a film” (Luhr, Lehman 80). First and foremost, films are perceived in terms of their narrative structure. When discussing a film, audiences will recall its story line or characters to exemplify what the film was about.
American Beauty film analysis American Beauty a film directed by Sam Mendes, shares an uncomfortably real perspective into the lives of two American families. Mendes effectively deconstructs the fabricated illusion of the ‘American Dream’ by dissecting American Culture. He does this buy crafting a story around stereotypical characters and then scene by scene peeling away the layers of each character to produce a portrayal; of the reality of human lives – not the false one society has built. Through the use of film construction, Mendes conveys to the audience the unattainable reality of the American Dream. He also communicates his ideologies regarding conformity, happiness and most important of all – beauty.
Bill Nichols states in his text, “Observational documentaries de-emphasise persuasion to give us a sense of what it is like to be in a situation without a sense of what it is like for the filmmaker to be there too. Participatory documentary gives us a sense of what it is like for the filmmaker to be in a given situation and how that situation alters as a result.” In this paper I will contend that the argument Nichols puts forward is arguably inaccurate. Like wise with participatory documentaries, observational documentaries portray a sense of interaction and influence by the filmmaker and thus candidly alter reality. As a result both documentaries become very subjective and biased, and the viewer is restrained from obtaining the whole truth of the story or event. Observational documentaries are what Erik Barnouw calls “direct cinema”.
Analyzing Documentary Films 1. Genre – a common definition of the documentary is that it is a film which collects its material in the real world but which presents this material seen from a personal angle or perspective. The documentary is an art form, and not just a media that registers the truth about a given material. In other words, a documentary will always be an adaption of reality. There are different types of documentaries e.g.
Although they might be brown or white, inside of that colour is still human, and they should have as much chance as everyone else. Joshua thinks that society thinks brown people can’t succeed. An example of this is when he says “if I were a girl, either by myself or with a baby in or beside me, victim of teen pregnancy with a guy in high school”. I personally find this highly unfair how society is judging brown people because they are a different colour. This story inspires me, and I’m sure it will inspire you as well.