Critique of Mother of Pearl by Melinda Haynes

1381 Words6 Pages
Pearl, not White, Black, or Feminine Just a Gem In Coming of Age in Mississippi (1968), Anne Moody portrays in her story that racist ideology is more complex than just whites hating blacks. Finding herself in jail for simply holding a peaceful march, Moody says, “I imagined myself in Nazi Germany” rather than Mississippi, a state in American, the land of the free (Moody 307). Now Melinda Haynes’ Mother of Pearl (1999) takes that ideology a step further by conveying identity and gender stereotypes into newly acceptable social roles with the redefining of white, black, working class, middle class, female and male identities in a harsh southern culture. Haynes set her story in a small southern town of Petal, Mississippi, in 1956. Her novel reads like a fairy tale where discrimination and violence were mild while freedoms and acceptance is open to all. The racial identities of her main four black characters as strong, smart and brave is stereotypical of that rights oriented movement but not in the direction of freedom. Their daily lives are far too “normal” for a historic fictional recreation. The color lines were blurred throughout the novel as Grace breastfed a white child. In pre-civil war Mississippi, this may have been a normal occurrence but in civil rights movement Mississippi, this definitely would not have happened. Much of the racial bias was portrayed with accuracy but Haynes missed the mark with the degree of cruelty and violence. The normalcy surrounding the two Lesbian women, Bea Godnst and Neva Landry, daily lives being accepted into the narrow-minded culture borders absurdity for that era and for their sexual orientation. Mississippi in the 1950s was an unaccepting culture unto its own narrow-minded way of thinking, even to the blacks desperately wanting change. The audience witnesses this when Canaan Mosley, an older well-read black man speaks about
Open Document