It sounds confusing but when people see a man with a gun, no matter what side of the law he is on, they will get intimidated and possibly fear him. Taking away this gun will give that man less power, but he will also gain the people’s respect. For a society with police and people to coexist peacefully without conflict, weapons should not be involved. This way, less crime will occur and police will be respected more. A real life example of this perfect world is England today.
The purpose also is if law enforcement was to take the evidence it would not be used in the court of law unless issue or that person can be set free of all charges. Basically one wrong moved can make us lose a suspect of a horrible crime if we are not careful. Law enforcement just need to be cautious so they are doing their jobs correct, and setting a person free will get them into trouble (cjlf.org, 2011). When we are identifying the exclusionary rule it is a great rule to have so police have to stop and think. Police have to think before they search because it could cost them a lot if they just do what they want.
Criminal justice professionals play an important role in the court system, and if they lie on accusations and evidence, the innocent become victims of the dishonesty. A second quality that is good to see in the criminal justice professions is to be objective. It is important for our law enforcement and public servants to not let their personal goals, feelings, or prejudice to get in the way of the criminal justice goals. Objectivity ensures that the professionals will make the right choices even when they have reasons that should make them choose otherwise. A simple example of this trait could be a law enforcement officer writing a ticket to someone regardless of the relationship they may or may not have.
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and Code of Practice are the main laws that have been produced to try to protect the rights of people, for the public to feel safe and the police to have a guideline.. But some people think that they infringe on human rights to go about their business and their right to privacy. Lawful arrest and detention are two of the police actions that are covered in PACE and are regulations that police must follow . They are there to protect the people who have been arrested and detained. The Act also benefits the police because if they follow the rules, they will not get any complaints against them which they could be disciplined .
This may just be a “sense” of safety, but officers like to think their partner has their back. In truth is could be safer to fight crime individually, because two police officers may seem to evoke the individuals with which they are involved with. Having two people looking out for the situation is extremely beneficial. If one officer is occupied with a task, her partner can be keeping a watchful eye on the surroundings and the circumstances that have a potential of arising. When all these factors are grouped together it appears that police partners would be more productive, writing more citations, and completing more arrests.
To be an officer they must take it very seriously in order to keep our streets safe. I also prefer the law enforcement code of ethics because of their confidentiality; they must keep things to themselves which also is very ethical. Officers cannot pick favorites they must know when they are on the job that they are there to work and if you break the law you must pay for your crime. Officers put their lives in danger everyday doing their job which is ethical by helping people every day. Overall an officer seems to have the best code of ethics to me due to their everyday
Use of force is a very important part of an officer’s ability to keep themselves and the public safe, but is also very controversial. The first thing anyone should try, if not in immediate danger, is to verbally diffuse a situation. If an officer can use words to get compliance from a criminal, then he or she won’t have to worry about defending their actions in court. There are no ethical issues involved with this level of the continuum. The use of restraint holds and chokes is a very dangerous thing if used improperly, but has many advantages when done correctly.
Many juries also don’t fully understand the legal system, which can be seen as a good thing because the accused is being judged by his peers, but it could also lead the jury to make an incorrect decision on whether the suspect is guilty or not guilty. Jurors can’t ask the witness any questions either, so they have to make a decision even if they
They are important for those who are in positions of power, due to their influence on society. Ethics and integrity are imperative in the law enforcement industry because first and foremost, they can ruin lives. A misjudgment from a law enforcement officer can cost someone their freedom for a crime they’ve not committed, therefore, when determining what crime has been committed, the officer has a set of ethical standards and guidelines they need to follow to ensure the individual is not charged for a crime that is more than he or she has committed. Second, law enforcement officers are in a position of power. People in those positions, if not given set parameters, and even when so, sometimes abuse the power and authority that is given to them.
Is it ethical or unethical…that is the question. First off, what is “professional courtesy?” In law enforcement professional courtesy is when an on-duty officer pulls over an off-duty or retired officer for some traffic violation and lets him go, by not issuing a ticket or arresting him. The central ideal behind this behavior is that cops have to stick together, to look out for each other. In a profession that yields little respect from the general public officers should support other officers, not try to bring them down. This subject has many perspectives however, and each officer, depending on his life experiences and personal values, feels differently about this ethical dilemma.