Once you become exclusive, it is expected that you will only give yourself to your partner, and by going out of the relationship you have broken the trust created. The biggest reasoning that cheating is morally unacceptable is that the consequences that it may face will affect many. If a relationship has been created and you establish that you are going to be exclusive, you break the other persons trust if you begin to date or have sexual contact with another. It defeats the purpose of becoming exclusive, if you are going to go out of the relationship.
Since both partners in a relationship need to be able to express their needs and preferences without the fear of being attacked either verbally or physically, young married couples must read articles that give advice on how to improve their relationship. In the first article, “Man to Man, Women to Women” Sherman and Haas point out that “misunderstandings often develop that lead to major fights.” This may occur most of the time when both partners have poor communication. One major reason this happens is because “men and women like to talk about different topics.” Not having the same interest in variety of topics between couples, may lead to miscommunication. Ranging from different topics, females tend to lean towards on topics of “problems, family, health and reproductive concerns” where men tend to talk more about “music, current events and sports.” Men and women like to talk about different topics but they may disagree with each others ideas. At times, some young married couples may be married for 2-10 years but they might still be “intimate strangers” which is a greater problem for a relationship.
Enemies are there to tear someone down. They judge for what one has and for what one lacks. The choices made will be degraded upon by an archenemy, unknowingly of the reason why. Enemies want to the worst for people because it makes them feel superior. They deride, criticize and minimize goals while attempting to divert one from working toward them.
[In the Psychoanalytic chapter of the book Critical Theory Today author Lois Tyson does a wondering job defining Fear of Intimacy.] Tyson states “ Fear of intimacy- the chronic and overpowering that emotional closeness will seriously hurt or destroy us and that we can remain emotionally safe only by remaining at an emotional distance from others at all times.” (16) the way to put this is that we need to pick and choose very carefully who to get close to. There are many people that we often get close to and end up getting hurt because we get to attached. [Next Tyson describes] “Fear of abandonment- the unshakeable belief that our friends and love ones are going to desert us (physical abandonment) or don’t really care about us (emotional abandonment)”. (16) In other worlds she means when you get abandon by friends and
Another weakness is the consequences, in some situations when consequences are too severe that many think it is better to break a rule than allow awful thing to happen. The theory is too rigid, sometimes the consequences can change the rightness or a wrongness of an action, but in this theory the person is judged on the action which can be unfair. It’s inflexible as you should be able to break a rule if the individual’s circumstances warrant it. There is no consideration to human emotion, there are situation where individuals break rules because of emotions, for example if a person is scared they may lie to protect themselves which in Kant’s eyes this would be morally wrong. The theory is a priori, some claim we out our duty a priori but it is also argued we need to refer to experience to work out what is right.
We are encouraged to focus on all the bad things that may happen especially from our news and media telling us how things are not as good as they used to be. Another reason people fear change because it is the unknown. Lack of knowledge creates fear. People become comfortable with the status quo. So, even when something changes for the better, it takes energy to accept it.
If we continue contradicting our conscience, our wretched acts will become usual acts. Some wrong acts that have been done normally by some people are stealing, lying, cheating, and dishonesty. These acts have become normal for people who have denied what their conscience has told them. If this happens, your conscience will slowly disappear and this will allow you to do more wrong doings that could lead you to a disruptive life. A way to strengthen one’s natural law is to simply listen to the dictates of his own conscience and allow his mind and body to work with his conscience.
That's why friends are there for you. If you keep things private to yourself, people around you wont understand what is happening with you, which you end up hurting you and make another pile of stress. The most common examples are relationships. When your relationship isn't going so great and you keep it to yourself, seeing your friends or families and they ask you how you are you doing. You get more stressed and hurt because you're keeping it private.
Many people may say insidious is such a strong word for two harmless words. But these words can be harmful to many people. I like to call them dangerous words because they put people in their own category. They show the separation between people even now in the days that we believe that we are all equal. “We and them” are words that people use in everyday life and they have no clue that they are so insidious.
The public is hard.” From that it can be seen that the public is bias towards the circumstances of the supposed victim and wants the accused punished without any regard to their situation. When it comes to a crime the community wants to be put at ease. They want someone convicted and justice to be served as soon as possible. However, what happens in the case of an innocent person being wrongly accused? This is called a ‘miscarriage of justice’.