In today’s political world, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between pressure groups and political parties. Although there are certain differences between the two, there are factors which make the lines blur Firstly, both parties and pressure groups have input in the legislative process. Insider groups have influence on government and often an important decision may be made as a result of a powerful stunt done by a pressure group. Also, some top pressure groups are funded by the taxpayers money which blurs the distinction between them and political parties. State-funded PG include ASH and Greenpeace.
In order for many bills to get passed there is often a need for compromise between members of Congress as such favours are often exchanged in order to gain crucial votes on legislation. This complicates and lengthens the legislative process because it could result in other Congressmen rejecting the bill. An example of such is in 2005, where a $223 million earmark was included in a bill to provide funding for reconstruction efforts
Parties have been known to be competitive, potentially affecting the type of policies that states pursue. Political parties and interest groups are different; however they do share some similarities in their functions. A political party is an organization that seeks to gain and maintain power within government. It seeks to run the government and enforce policies. Its functions consist of nominating candidates to office that the people would vote for and attaching their party name to the candidate to influence voter choice, organize and run elections, and organize the legislature.
A pressure group is a group of like-minded individuals who are trying to collectively influence policy makers on a particular issue. Many people have different ideas on whether they benefit democracy or not. There are different types of pressure groups. Sectional groups which represent the interests of particular sections in society eg NASUWT. Promotional groups which promote current issues such as anti-fox hunting.
This means that individual members don’t have the same amount of power than the MP's. Even though they don’t have the same amount of power then MP's and the Labour party members, yet they still have power to elect the final party leader. Labour party and liberal democrats members are also able to select a candidate for their local election (MP's). Firstly the candidate must be eligible to stand for the process of parliamentary candidates, and then the local party draws up a short list of hopeful party members. After the short list is drawn up party members from the particular constituency then vote for the MP they believe would be most suitable to represent their constituency.
A link exists between class and voting'. Discuss the extent to which class still influences voting behaviour in the UK Class Voting and partisanship Professor Peter Pulzer illustrates it is often that social class is the key determinant in voting behaviour. The study of voting behaviour is important because it helps us to explain the process of political change, not only changes in government but also changes in parties, policies and ideological beliefs. However there is no agreement about how voting behaviour should be explained, as there are several factors which determine the reasons to voting behaviour despite social class. In the 1960’s Pulzer concluded that ‘class is the basis of British Politics; all else is embellishment and detail’.
The consumers are risk-neutral: if they have probability p of getting a high quality product, they value this prospect 14p + 8(1 - p) Each type of manufacturer can produce the product at a constant unit cost of 11. a) Suppose that the sale of low quality calculators is illegal, so that the only items allowed to appear on the market are of high quality. What will be the equilibrium price? b) Suppose that there are no high quality sellers. How many low quality calculators would you expect to be sold in equilibrium? c) Could there be an equilibrium in which equal (positive) quantities of the two types of calculators appear in the market?
Monopoly and Price Discrimination What we called monopoly is the sole seller if the product and that product do not have close substitutes. Monopoly can control the prices of their goods, but their profit is not limited because high prices reduce the amount that their consumers buy. The most important cause of monopoly is barriers to entry. The three main sources are owned by a single firm, the government gives a single firm the exclusive right to produce some good or services, and the cost of production makes a single producer more efficient than a large number of producers like the distribution of water. Monopoly is the sole producer in the market; its demand curve is the market demand.
Due to the Electoral College today, it is hard to say for some whether or not the process of voting is fair and actually matters, or if your vote as a citizen of the United States does not count and is simply a waste of time. Today I am going to share my opinion on this controversial topic. The Election Process 3 Is The Election Process Fair? According to UEN.org, an election is the process by which citizens select thousands of men and women they want to run their government- at all levels. Some people believe that the current election process we use in the United States of America is not a fair one.
they also build alliances, campaign assistance, as well as other forms of pressure as functions of their purpose.political parties on the other hand, want to run the government vs just influence it, and they want to make and enforce policies. the functions of political party are:recruiting candidates,for the purpose of finding someone that would appeal to others. they also organize and run elections, for the purpose of getting other people involved. another fuction would be to offer several policies, for the purpose of variety, and a feeling of choice within the people. they also would organize congress, as a purpose.there are some similarities between political parties and interest groups.