Comparing Two Sources

484 Words2 Pages
Both sources 1 and 3 immediately engage with their reader’s attention by using varied sentence lengths. Source 1, ‘Britain’s big problem with water’, has varied sentence lengths to put across various views. Long sentences such as ‘The North and West normally get plenty of rain ... receive less than parts of the Mediterranean’ are needed so they can state the factual content of the article. Short sentences are also used in the article, but are built to emphasise previous points such as ‘But it’s true’. By using varied sentences the writer, ‘Geoffry Lean’ effectively intrigues the reader to read the entire article and not bore the reader with a crammed factual article. Source 3, also immediately engages with the reader’s attention by starting with a short simple sentence. ‘Our tents were pitched right at the water’s edge’, in ‘Ferry across the lake’ intrigues the reader to want to know more about Ondaatje’s journey and causes the reader to read on. Like Source 1, source 3 also uses varied sentence lengths. By using varied sentence lengths it could be said that is reflecting or mirroring the confusion of the writer’s feelings…show more content…
Phrases such as ‘glimmers of golden light’ and ‘spectacular sunrise’ show the positive and warm feelings that the writer is feeling. This, however, is in contrast with some of the language later on where it states ‘hot as hell’ and ‘decrepit old ferry boat’ shows both tiredness and annoyance by creating a negative tone. Source 3 uses dramatic language to add to the excited tone. “A few minutes later we were treated to a spectacular sunrise.” It creates an excited feeling because instead of lessening the feeling, like Source 1 to be sarcastic and derisive, it uses hyperbole to exaggerate it. ‘Spectacular’ heightens the sunrise because it is not a word we normally use, and it makes the sunrise incredible and
Open Document