Comparative analysis of A Boys Life and Womens Right to Vote

1436 Words6 Pages
Comparative analysis of A Boy’s Life and Women’s Right to Vote The speech ‘Women’s Right to Vote’ by Susan B. Anthony and the memoir ‘This Boy’s Life’ by Tobias Wolff are two very different works in both style and context. Anthony wrote the speech in 1872 to appeal to the American public for taking away women’s suffrage and treating women unfairly. Wolff’s memoir is written to depict his early life as a teenager in 1950s and the people around him. Wolff does not explicitly indicate women’s social roles in the books, but he indirectly shows the life that women live in mid 1900s through several female figures’ experiences. Although the purposes of the two works and the ways of portraying women’s roles are different, both works effectively reflect women’s statuses in America in two different time periods. The purposes and the contexts of the two texts are obviously different. Anthony’s ‘Women’s Right to Vote’ is a speech after her arrest for voting in presidential election ‘illegally’. Anthony clearly mentions the purpose by saying, ‘It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus doing, I not only committed no crime, but instead simply exercised my citizen’s rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution beyond the power of any State to deny.’ (P.38 line3) As a fighter for women’s rights in 19th century, Anthony is furious about women being treated unfairly or even inferiorly. The tone of the text is very formal, and Anthony explicitly discuses women’s inferior status especially the condition without voting right. On the other hand, the memoir, ‘This Boy’s Life’ is written with the purpose to tell Wolff’s own story as a teenager. As Wolff says in the foreword section, ‘…it is a book of memory, and memory has its own story to tell.’ The focus of the text is on Wolff himself and his life changes, but there is in
Open Document