Moore and WD Ross a fellow intuitionist agreed that pleasure, knowledge and virtue are all intrinsically good, and pain, ignorance and vice are intrinsically bad. However, they disagreed about our basic moral duties. Unlike Intuitionism, Emotivism does not purport the existence of objective moral facts, truths or duties. Instead it takes
Nonetheless, both articles are idealistic. In another phrase, they are morally wrong. To get a true understanding of what an essay is saying we must concern ourselves with is what the author is truly trying to convey. There are often hidden messages in writing that inexperienced readers often look over and take for granted. This is the issue that is at stake with both readings of “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift and Garret Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics.” Hardin’s essay that is serious in tone, while Swift’s offers similar views appears to be poking fun by starting at in a serious tone at first glance but in reality is far from it.
While Ethical Naturalists believe it holds great importance as it can convey facts and help us to understand ethical theories, there are those who strongly disagree with this. For example Intuitionists, such as Moore, believe that our intuition is more useful when wanting to know how to act morally than knowing the definitions of ethical terms. Although Non-Cognitive theories disagree with the factual content of ethical statements, it is clear that they still see some significance in ethical language. However rather than seeing it as facts, they accept that morality is subjective and suggest that the importance of ethical language is provided by the emotions conveyed in the phrases used. Perhaps more so than Emotivists, Prescriptivists see ethical language as fairly meaningful.
Project Management Summary CPMGT/301 Project Management Summary Project managers and portfolio managers are often confused with one another by business managers and stakeholders. Project management is a broader term used for those that include both program management and portfolio management. There are many similarities between portfolio management and project managers making them relate to one another. Within either a project portfolio or a program, project managers have to make decisions that are goal oriented and consistent with an intended strategic outcome. According to our text that we were tasked with reading this week, Project Portfolio Management (PPM) has clear benefits as stated, “Provide a structure for selecting the right projects and eliminating the wrong ones, allocate resources to the right projects, which in turn reduce unnecessary spending, align
“The judge determines the law when, while the jury is responsible for finding facts of the case in most common law jurisdiction”. Is the American jury system still a good idea? Is a good question to ask and in my personal opinion I do not believe it is. The reason why is based on documents B, C, D provides why I feel strong about my opinion. To begin with, the word “sacred crow” is something that is well respected and people do not want criticized.
However they do have the ability to make suggestions to possibly amend the law through highlighting flaws. The judiciary cannot make judgments past the jurisdiction of the law even in interests of natural justice. A strong example of this was the Belmarsh Case, where judges believed the system of holding foreigners against the will under the anti-terrorism act contradicted with human rights. This law was subsequently changed. This could pose some doubt as to the judges power, as although they can not officially change laws, they clearly have the power to suggest changes with ease, and some could argue that despite Lord Neuberger’s claims, they do indeed undermine parliamentary sovereignty through their suggestion of changes.
Constitutional law is a group of laws made to keep a good foundation and it gives an idea of the outcome of business. It deals with some of the fundamental relationships within our society and it keeps relationships rational. On the other hand, some state powers include High State Courts, State Courts of Appeals, State Trial Courts of General Jurisdiction and State Administrative Agencies. This also helps to keep a good structure. 2.
It can be implied from this that Wolsey had the ability to obtain Henry’s annulment, but failed due to his lack of effort and his half-hearted approach. Furthermore, source 1 supports this view, first implying once again that Wolsey had good contacts and that he had the ability to influence them, “Stafileo has changed his opinion”. However, a lack of effort can still be seen here as he only instructed Stafileo of the facts. It is likely that source 2 is more reliable than source 1 as it was a letter written by the Duke of Suffolk who was not directly involved in the ‘Great Matter’. As the source is also from a letter, it is unlikely the Duke of Suffolk would not have feared angering Wolsey as otherwise the letter would have been private.
Bill C-10 In Bill C-10, Canadian Conservatives have introduced a crime bill that increases mandatory sentences on some crimes, but they have ignored proven programs that cost less and improve societal outcomes. The idea of being “tough on crime” is emotionally satisfying and easy to sell politically. In fact it is hard to be against it. One would appear weak, or to be coddling criminals, or worse anti-victim if they don’t make a “tough” stand against crime. It is politically advantageous and morally satisfying position to take without any regards to the consequences of these actions.
The lawyer doesn’t think that Bartleby response was wrong in fact he thinks that it was in fact innocent. Thomas Dilworth states that Bartleby famous I rather not do it could only be understood by the unnamed lawyer due to the outer story which involves the