This camp site looks really old and dirty. It seems to me that it is not looked after well. e) Do you think this letter would be considered appropriate in Australia today? Why? I think that this letter would not be appropriate in Australia today as were not in an era were racism is tolerated and we don’t judge people on where their parents were born.
He firmly believes Iowa should not be such a large part of the elections and that we should definitely not be the first state to hold caucuses. Unfortunately for Bloom, his methods are quite inefficient, to the point where he angered too many people to be taken seriously. If I were from, say California, and read this article, I really do not think that I can believe anything he says! He seems too biased to be reliable! He even insults people by saying “geographically challenged, a little about Iowa, including where Iowa is and perhaps more importantly, in both a real and metaphysical way, what Iowa is” (Bloom 1).
This culminated in the few aspects of how argument towards the contest is evident. Thus, in summary all of these events and controversies have driven the Archibald Prize to maintain its importance to artists all around Australasia. Consequently, the combination of these factors brought about controversy and debate of the Archibald Prize. Few artists may have displayed and demonstrated their strengths in the art making process despite potential conflict. Without the controversy and views from the audience, the contest would not motivate artists from all over Australasia to compete in such a contest.
Justice absolutely cannot be found through these techniques because threatening someone and forcing them into a scared confession is no way serving justice. I believe in interrogations but when you put someone in a room for that long all alone with no one to help them how can you even believe that that person is going to have rational thoughts and be able to withstand that kind of mental
This is sadly, a true and not uncommon tale. As she approaches shore, neither she nor her family could have anticipated the despair, the disillusion, the self-harm, and the attempted suicides that await those whom seek refuge in Australia. But all this is a result of the brutality of Australia’s current policy. Many argue the fact that asylum seekers are “queue jumpers” and “illegal immigrants”. This is not the case and cannot be the case.
In this persuasive text by The Age, 'The Afghanistan Debate Rages On' refers to the conditions of the Australian's taking into consideration of the Afghan involvement during a Parliament debate. The Parliamentarians are certain that this debate has not been taken seriously nor engaging which means that Australia's involvement will remain unchanged. This text is persuading the audience to believe that this debate is neither contructive or useful, yet just another waste of time and resources. Arrogance, frustration, anger and pointlessness is widely demonstrated throughout the text. This war has sparked controversy from the media, families have been lost and people have died from the cause of fighting for their own country.
Malcolm’s path in life was abruptly challenged when he went to prison, yet he harnessed the forces within himself to triumph his misfortune. Now I didn't go to prison, but I was confronted with a catastrophe that nearly devoured me. I was suddenly confronted with the law and being accused of a crime I did not commit. I was humanly furious because the law was suddenly being used as a word against me. During the proceedings, I was terror-stricken because I didn’t know how to properly address a court and I couldn’t afford an Attorney to speak on my behalf.
This led to over-complication and users felt intimidated and confused by the system. Tribunals are frequently seen as another alternative to the courts, but the biggest difference is that if the case fails at the Tribunal stage, there is no redress to the courts, whereas if any other form of ADR fails, the parties still get the option of going to court to resolve their dispute. A tribunal usually consists of three people; one neutral chairperson and one representative from each side, usually a union representative or a specialist in the area. History of tribunals 1957 – Franks Committee
To begin with, it defeats the whole point of having democratically elected officials. They are mandated with the responsibility of making decisions on behalf of the citizens. Having referendums undermines this role making them powerless, almost useless. Another disadvantage of holding referendums is the extensive period of time it takes. Referendums cannot be used to make a decision of immediate necessity as it takes weeks and sometimes months to come up with a final decision.
The leading factors of concern related to the current cyber law policies in Australia, and all across the world, include the lack of privacy offered to users of the internet, insignificant means being taken to protect users from cyber threats, the lack of protection against cyber bullying and the rising hazard of cyber-crime due to a deficiency of sufficient protection against cyber-criminals. The leading issues regarding cyber laws in Australia are the lack of privacy offered to individuals residing in Australia, and the increasingly explicit material being available to personalities of all ages. Moreover, the case of child pornography on the internet serves to be a problem of increasing concern. Present-day cyber laws in Australia require carriers and carriage service providers to preserve stored communications when requested by certain domestic agencies. Furthermore, they ensure that a foreign country can secure access to stored computer data, including preserved data; and allow a stored communication warrant to be obtained for foreign law enforcement purposes.