The American respondents were reluctant to marry somebody who they did not love as only 14% said that they would agree to marry. In contrast to this, the collectivist cultures had higher percentages such as India with 24% and Thailand with 34%. These results therefore suggest that a higher proportion from collectivist cultures is willing to marry with the absence of their love. This therefore supports the idea that there are differences in relationships between cultures as the results were not similar or even the same between cultures. This also
I'm not sure if this is as much of a big deal as some people make it out to be. for some people, if they would have lived together with their spouse, before getting married, I'm sure would have changed their mind in actually marrying that person and would would have changed the outcome of their entire life just by finding out that living with their significant other wouldn't work. There is no such thing as a perfect marriage or a perfect relationship. Everyone knows that there is a lot of give and take to make things work. But what if someone isn't willing to compramise?
I would have been a disgrace to my family and probably would have been disowned. Love to me is a very serious thing to consider and I have trust issues of letting people in intimately so marrying a stranger wouldn't work for me. If I was going to share the rest of my life with someone, share my bed, and myself, someone to be the father of my children then it would have to be someone I know, trust, and love. In history there were many cases of abuse, murder, suicide, and spouses who ran away because they were force to marry people they didn't love and sometimes people they didn't know very well. Especially because way
Marriage is the most important social institution, and it is a formality for the perpetuation of procreation; hence same sex marriage cannot meet this requirement. In other words, same sex marriage does not aid in procreation, which sustains our species. Same sex marriage will destroy our society. Some believe that although gay couples cannot produce children, they can have adopted children and fulfill a social need. That may seem like a good idea, but I am sure that there must be differences between a child who grows up in an environment with same sex couples than with regular heterosexual parents.
An important aspect of being single is being “free” to do what they what, when they want. People can spend their money without consulting a partner or thinking about the financial needs of children and many people prefer to be single by choice because of this reason. Liberal thinking tends to accept having a partner does not constitute that we have to partake in marriage, but instead collect multiple partners and select who is the right one for them. Some people have marriage in the back of their minds, but if they enjoy being single, marriage will not be a part of their immediate future
Almost all people think that getting married the one who he or she loves is natural. But there are some situations when someone cannot get married to him or her because it is socially unacceptable. The definition of marriage for different people means different things. Marriage has some forms, but nowadays the same sex marriage is the most discussed topic. So in this essay I’m going to compare the traditional marriage and the same sex marriage.
When I thought of polygamy I thought of grown men marring many women, which some of them at very young ages. I have been raised to believe marriage should be between one man and one woman. I could never wrap my head around this cultural practice. I now realize the women are the ones who suffer the most. The practice of polygamy distorts the meaning of marriage.
Adoption in my opinion should just be illegal in every state because you are just taking a harmless baby's life for no reason, the baby didn't ask you to make it. If you know you that you don't want to have a baby you should make sure that you have a condom on, to be safe because you might have gotten lucky a few time's of having unprotected sex but it will eventually catch up with you and get you pregnant and get you in a situation that you don't wanna be in. I don't think someone at a young age wants to be in a situation like that so they don't have to make such a hard decision in your life, because the
This can simply mediated by allowing baby designing. There you go. Some people may say that it’ll cause population growth but then again, the parents were going to have a baby anyways, designer baby or not so that population numbers would not reflect (in growth) the effect of allowing designer babies. Children should not suffer because the way they turned out was not what their parents, society, or even themselves wanted (Weebly 1). The fact that designer babies are a controversial topic is ridiculous.
Much of the conflict between old and new revolves around family life, the roles of women and children, and marriage-areas that in Indian culture are closely governed by tradition. Many young people aggravate at the rules imposed by their parents, who seem much stricter than other American parents do. Perhaps the single most troublesome issue between parents and children in Asian Indian American families has been dating. In traditional Indian culture, dating is unheard of; boys and girls have very little contact with one another before marriage, which is arranged by their parents. Dating is completely foreign to traditional Indian ideas about the proper relationship between the sexes.