This is a map that is individual to the person where they will have routine routes of where they will walk/drive etc. Brantingham theory suggests that offenders are more likely to operate in areas ‘cognitively known’ to them rather than places they don’t, so can explain patterns such as burglary in certain areas. This theory explains where crimes are more likely to happen, but Clarke’s opportunity theory explains why certain victims are chosen and others aren’t. As it depends if the target is accessible so how easy it is to commit the crime such as no security cameras in a store will probably have a high percentage of stolen goods. Another factor is that it depends on how attractive the target is in that how much will the individual gain from committing the crime or how easily the crime can be implemented such as robbing from a bank will have a high risk factor.
Even though professional district judges can get through 30% more cases than a lay magistrate, (mainly because they spend less time conferring with court clerks), they cost £61.78 per hour. Magistrates work on a voluntary basis and only get paid expenses which works out at £52.10 per hour. This is good news for the taxpayer. (K. Malleson, R Moules, The Legal System 4th Edition P234) Because magistrates are unqualified they can seek help and advice from a qualified court clerk. Lord Parker CJ described the clerk as “the most important person in the administration of justice.” (P Darbyshire, Darbyshire On The English Legal System 10th Edition P512).
There are also community programmes and mental health teams to help schizophrenic patients. preventing
Why? Because they are getting paid the rates they want and they are hired to get the criminal the lesser charge as possible. While the criminals with a public defender, because they cannot afford a private attorney just get represented because they have to. “Most people agreed that ‘it would be easy to get a lawyer if I needed one,’ while at the same time expressing the view that ‘it costs
Life without parole costs less than the death penalty (Marceau & Whitson, 2013). The death penalty is much more expensive than life in prison, mostly because of the upfront costs of the legal process which is supposed to prevent executions of innocent people. Many opponents of the death penalty argue that the millions of dollars saved by instituting life without parole could be used for education, drug and
Moreover, the detail available in police files varied substantially, depending on the willingness of police officers to ask victims systematically for the specifics of crime events. The are many positive factors in conducting these surveys. First of all there is the advantage that the rich qualitative data is anonymous which protect the individuals being surveyed. Another positive factor is that the surveys are easy to administer and cheaper then other methods. These surveys are very nice because, they allow these respondents to explain there experiences in their own words.
Civil cases however require different approaches such as mediation and conciliation to resolve civil disputes. Generally for criminal cases, judicial determination is preferred and for civil cases, mediation or conciliation is used. However civil cases may also use judicial determination but most cases are solved through alternative dispute resolutions as the dispute can be reconciled by parties with the help of an independent third party and is usually more quick and cheaper. Mediation is a cooperative method of resolving disputes and is widely used by courts, tribunals and other dispute resolution bodies. Mediation is a method that is usually used to resolve civil disputes between two parties.
Intermediate sanctions are a variety of punishments that are more restrictive than traditional probation but less severe and costly than incarceration. The purpose of intermediate sanctions is to make the offender pay for the crime they committed in a way that isn’t unfair or to costly to the justice system. For example, if a person gets a speeding ticket, instead of putting them in jail for a year which would cost us a lot of money, we just make them pay a fine. The idea of intermediate sanctions is good because it saves us money and gives people that commit non serious offenses or crimes the chance to show they don’t belong in jail. On the other hand, it may lead some people to think that it is ok for them to do these offenses because they don’t have to go to jail as a consequence.
Death penalty is the best way to bring justice because it is cheap. The government can save a lot of money with death penalty. When prisoners get sentenced to death, taxpayers would not have to pay tax to supply the needs of the prisoners who did a heinous crime. Instead of using the money to sustain murderers, the money could be use in many other projects that can help the citizens of the United States. We can use the money to make roads and give the budget to financial aid, towards education, and projects for the future of the country.
Society puts the courts and prosecutors set up to figure out who has overstepped the public’s laws. Despite the fact that society advises casualties the discipline to the wrongdoer will improve they feel, I don't think most casualties don't feel alleviation. The discipline of the wrongdoer won't bring back the individual they have lost, through the criminal demonstration of another. I feel that law violations including the robbery of cash can be repaid to the casualty by the compensation from the criminal, to make them entire once more. As I would like to think, if people are not considered responsible for law violations against mankind, our general public will never again be viewed as socialized.