Advantages and Disadvantages of preserving or restoring natural

628 Words3 Pages
The advantages and/or disadvantages of preserving and/or restoring natural areas makes for a great discussion. It is a great debate that will go on for eternity, the reason I say that will be evident in this paper. The advantages are to protect our way of life. We can’t have wild life if they don’t have a place to live. We need the wet lands to help keep our water in check. We need the prairie lands to have small animals to hunt. We need the wooded areas in order to harvest it to keep our home in good condition. We have found that fire helps maintain any wildlife habitat by controlled burns, they remove weeds and woody vegetation effectively while stimulating native plant growth. The wildlife grants help cover costs. Shortly after a controlled burn you might see new plants like lacy prairie smoke. You will also find that the areas provide natural diversity for endangered and threatened species. We aren't especially comfortable with nature, because as creatures of habit we aren't especially comfortable with change. We have set ourselves as a species apart from all others, only to learn from the hard lessons of extinction and degraded landscapes that we're not as fully in control as we thought. People are a part of the ecosystem management process. Goals are shaped not only by scientific knowledge, but by human values; decisions made with citizens, rather than for them, are likely to be more successful. Trees provide more than just beauty to your community. They release oxygen we need to breathe. They absorb and trap carbon dioxide and other pollutants. A large tree canopy softens the blow from a downpour, allowing rain to soak gradually into the ground. Less runoff reduces flooding; pollution, sedimentation in rivers and lakes, and the need to build bigger storm sewer

More about Advantages and Disadvantages of preserving or restoring natural

Open Document