A Doll's House, a Tragedy?

816 Words4 Pages
A Doll's House, a Tragedy? A tragedy, according to the New Oxford American Dictionary, is a play that has a melancholic ending that concerns the downfall of the main character. Aristotle defined it as “[A play] with incidents arousing pity and fear, wherewith to accomplish its catharsis of such emotions... Every tragedy therefore must have... Plot, Characters, Diction, Thought, Spectacle, [and] Melody.” Famous tragedies include Julius Caesar and Macbeth. A Doll's House, by Henrik Ibsen, cannot be considered a tragedy because although it meets some of the requirements of Aristotle's definition, it does not fit the complete profile of this literary style. To begin with, A Doll's House is quite different from well-known tragedies, especially in terms of the characterization of the protagonist. In tragedies such as Julius Cesar and Macbeth, the main characters are what we call tragic heroes. Tragic hero is defined as a privileged character of high repute who by a tragic flaw and fate suffers a fall from glory. For example, in Shakespeare’s Macbeth, Macbeth was a king whose flaw was his vengeful nature, which led him to lose everything he had, including his life. In Julius Caesar, also written by William Shakespeare, the hero Brutus was a good man of high position whose flaw was being too trusting, and this led to his inevitable death as well. Nora, the protagonist in Ibsen's A Doll's House, does not fit into the role of a tragic hero. She didn’t have the “tragic flaw” the main characters of tragedies are supposed to have. The only real “flaw” that provided a weakness or limitation to her was the fact that she was born a woman. Her gender, and more prominently, her gender role in society, plays a huge role in the play. It is the stem of her problems, for if she wasn’t a woman, there would be no conflict in the play. Joan Templeton explained the importance of Nora's
Open Document