Traditional And Nontraditional Litgation

871 Words4 Pages
Traditional and Nontraditional Litigation Litigation is a problem every organization handles. Litigation, or judicial dispute resolution, is “the process of bringing, maintaining, and defending a lawsuit” (Cheeseman, 2010, p. 35). An organization can follow traditional litigation procedures or it can choose nontraditional litigation, otherwise known as alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Cheeseman (2010) states, “[Traditional] litigation is a difficult, time-consuming, and costly process that must comply with complex procedural rules” (p. 35). ADR is a quicker, easier, and less expensive way to solve disputes, more often used for contractual and commercial disputes. Each dispute resolution action has strengths and weaknesses. Traditional Litigation There are multiple steps in traditional litigation. The pretrial process consists of “pleadings, discovery, dismissals and pretrial judgments, and settlement conference” [ (Cheeseman, 2010, p. 35) ]. The trial process includes jury selection, opening statements, plaintiff and defendant cases, rebuttal and rejoinder, closing arguments, jury instruction, jury deliberation and verdict, and entry of judgment, followed by possible appeals. Pretrial Litigation Process Pleadings consist of the “paperwork filed with the court to initiate and respond to a lawsuit” [ (Cheeseman, 2010, p. 35) ]. The plaintiff, or suing party, initiates the lawsuit by filing a complaint containing the parties involved, laws allegedly violated with validating facts, and a prayer for relief stating the asking remedy with the court. The court answers by issuing a summons to the defendant requiring an answer in court. The court serves the answer on the plaintiff. The answer is the admission or denial of allegations and may assert affirmative defenses. An admission of allegations results in a judgment entered against the defendant. A denial

More about Traditional And Nontraditional Litgation

Open Document