Case Study: State Of Confusion

1156 Words5 Pages
State of Confusion Edmund Peabody University of Phoenix Business Law BUS/415 Sherry Goodrum February 13, 2012 State of Confusion The state of Confusion endorsed an order entailing that all trucks and towing trailers that use its highways to use a B-type truck hitch. This hitch is created by only one company in Confusion. The outcome of this decree is that any truck driver who wishes to drive through Confusion must stop and have the new hitch mounted, or drive around Confusion. The federal government has not made any effort to adjust the truck hitches used on the nation’s highways. Tanya Tucker, who is the owner of a trucking company in the state of Denial, is not pleased about the added rate this statute enforces on her company.…show more content…
State of Confusion should be filed in the Federal District Court. This case should take place in a Federal Court because the decree generates an impermissible trouble on interstate commerce. According to USlegal.com Interstate commerce refers to the acquisition, retailing or trade of merchandise, shipping of public, funds or merchandise, and routing of waters among diverse circumstances. Interstate business is regulated by the national administration as endorsed in Article I of the U.S. Constitution. The federal government can also control exchange in a situation when it has an effect on interstate progress of supplies and provisions and may strike down state proceedings which are obstacles to such movements (2012). Is The Confusion Statue Constitutional? Discuss Your Legal Reasoning Under the meaning of Article III, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, the lawsuit stresses a “case of controversy.” Although states have the authority to set their own statues, some of them can cause distress and have to be evaluated by advanced courts. The state of Confusion is using the undemanding fact that the trucks have to drive through their state and are advancing from them economically. They are not requiring the B-type hitch to guard the roadways and are exclusively requiring the hitch to generate additional profits. Therefore, the Confusion statute is unconstitutional. What Provisions of the U.S. Constitution Will Be Applied by a Court…show more content…
The first step is to set up the case with the preliminary court papers. The first pleading needed to be filed is the Complaint/Petition. The intention of the objection is to present the defendant with notice of the accurate and official justification for the plaintiff’s argument. The Summons will inform the defendant that he or she is being sued. After the defendant receives the Summons, he or she will send an answer. The response will deal with each paragraph in the complaint. A counterclaim can be filed by the defendant if he or she has their own claim against the plaintiff. If there is a counterclaim filed the plaintiff may react by organizing a “Reply.” The Reply will “admit,” “deny,” or emphasize that the plaintiff deficient amount of information, just as the original answer did The second stage in the civil suit is Fact-Finding and Discovery. Federal court system requires disclosure of all pertinent information and documents to the other side prior. The third stage in a civil suit is the Resolution before the Trial Court Motions. Many important questions about your lawsuit can be resolved in Pretrial motions. The fourth stage in a civil suit is the Resolution before the Trial Settlement or Alternative Dispute Resolution. The fifth stage in a civil suit is the Trial and Verdict. The sixth stage in a civil suit is after the judgment and collecting the money. The seventh and last stage in a civil suit is the

More about Case Study: State Of Confusion

Open Document