The Crucible Act 3 Analysis

1630 Words7 Pages
A play in which the theme is made clear early on in the action is 'The Crucible' written by the well acclaimed author Arthur Miller in 1953. Miller, with great skill, clearly shows the main themes very early on with the use of a range of techniques such as key scenes, characterisation and dialogue. The dramatist introduces the theme of greed and vengeance immediately through the use of the narrative technique. We learn that Salem is a theocracy and so people were very repressed and the witch-hunt trials was an opportunity to break free from this. Many people accused those that they had long-held haterds for and those who had a substanstial amount of land. In Act 1.3 we are also introduced to the theme of integrity through the main character…show more content…
Key scenes, characterisation and dialogue are used to protray this. In Act 3.2, Proctor is told his wife is pregnant and therefore would be saved for at least another year. Danforth - the highest ranking judge at the proceedings - asks him if he will now drop the charges as he told them Mary Warren - one of the girls involved in the 'crying out' - will testify to it all being lies. He replies: " I think I cannot." It would be in his own interest to stop here but he doesn't. This makes me feel complete respect for him as he is motivated by the greater good and so bravely continues. In the climatic Act 3.3 the girls are called into the courtroom and questioned. They continue to deny that the whole witch-hunt fiasco was pretence. When Abigail cries for heaven, Proctor is infruriated and grabs her by the hair: " Whore! Whore!" He realises he must confess his sin of lechery. Any respect he had would diminish so we see how far he is willing to go. Shame-faced, he tells the judges: " I have known her." By pubically declaring his act of adultery, his honour is increased and we see him as a martyr. We see how exceptional his integrity is and so are left with feelings of pronounced admiration for
Open Document