Summary: The Chicago Alternative Policing Strategy

973 Words4 Pages
The Chicago Alternative Policing Strategy Alfreepha Williams AJS/502 February 25, 2013 Steve L. Cook Introduction According to Dantzker, Lurigio, Hartnett, and Houmes (1995), during that year, commnuinty policing was becoming the prevailing model of law enforcement in the United States and was highly popular among the chiefs, citizens and politicians. It was the key component of the Clinton administration’s anti-crime policy, and the only form of policing available for anyone who seeked to improve police operations, management or relations with the public. Community policing is a well known or one of the most popular strategy for policing. There were programs implemented for community policing, some that emphasized disorder and quality-of-life…show more content…
It requires meeting with the residents and getting to know them and understand their need and concerns. Within this feature, police officers were expectied to go into the community of those residents that needed and demanded special attention. These were areas that officers needed to know their beats such as the; crime trends, hot spots, and community resources and organizations to develop a relationship with the community to solve the problems (Dantzker, et al.). In order to create a resolution to a problem, you must first establish what the problem is, where is it and how or what can you do to solve or prevent the problem from…show more content…
It altered the basic philosphy of policing and stated that the police should work closely with the community instead of being an inward-looking community (Walker & Katz, Chapter 1, Community Policing, 2011). The Chicago Alternative Policing Strategy was established to help in the prevention and to decrease the crime rate in the community and to work closely with the residents. According to Innes (2006)There were findings indicate that people living in the CAPS prototype districts had significantly higher levels of satisfaction with police fighting crime than people living in matched comparison areas who were not subject to the CAPS program. The findings also indicate that the residents of the CAPS prototype communities were only marginally more satisfied with police keeping order than those living in non-CAPS communities (Lombardo, Olson, & Staton, 2010). their analysis demonstrates that did not have uniform effects across all sections of Chicago’s population. While white and African-American communities saw improvements in their conditions, no such improvements were registered in the city’s Hispanic
Open Document