Sports Guy Case Financial Analysis

320 Words2 Pages
Financial Analysis * The tax rate is approximately 30% 5.618.8=29.79% 5.418.1=29.83% 5.418=30% * Based on the industry average, a sports store of similar size should be making around $21000 or 67% more profitable than Rhodes’ store. * Assuming the lots are of the same size and bear the same tax burden, if the unused lot is sold off property taxes would be reduced by $6000 at the 2008 rate. All else being equal, this would increase net profit by 6000×0.30=$1800, for a total of $14400. Profit as a percentage of sales would increase from 2.1% to 2.4%. * Of the $18400 Rhodes made in mortgage payments last year, $8000 was interest. The income statement lists 2008 interest paid as $32000, which means that there are other debts that required payments of $24000. If possible, accelerating payback on these loans can be very beneficial in the long run. * At industry average levels, wages of a similar business would be approximately $79000, or $11000 lower. * Wages, advertising and rent total %23.1 of sales in the average business, leaving %1.9 of sales for property taxes, interest, utilities, depreciation and other expenses. While Rhodes saves 7.8% in rent due to his ownership of his property, these expenses total 9.8% of sales compared with the %1.9 industry average. Even if half the property tax can be expunged through sale of the unused lot, these expenses would still be %8.8 of sales. * Even with the relatively high expenses, Rhodes seems to be harmed most by his lackadaisical inventory management. His 2008 gross profit is 3.67% lower than the industry average (or 1.1% of sales). All else being equal, a 30% gross profit (the average) would have increased his net income by $4600. 600×0.30-155.01-0.30=17.5

More about Sports Guy Case Financial Analysis

Open Document