To me it is dangerous to use your head and neck to ram someone in order to knock them down. People think that racing is dangerous because of the speeds, look at how many football players were paralyzed this year and even killed compared to racing. Race cars are actually way safer than regular street cars. Now that I have given my opinion, I hope I can make a point without sounding rude or ignorant. My feelings are strong for racing like theirs is for other sports.
Drinking and driving is very dangerous and many people have their lives shattered and ruined because of drunk drivers. That is why it is becoming socially unacceptable. People are finally starting to realize how dangerous this can really be. With the help of new laws, and continued hard work, the number of drinking and driving accidents should be very little in the future. Anyone that is caught while intoxicated should never have the right to drive again.
The fact is that there were several cars involved which means a large number of witnesses. The reality is that more than one person saw the accident the way that it actually happened and will be able to say that Jackson is the one that caused it, not the woman. Even if this were not the case Jackson has a moral obligation to step forward and say that he caused the accident. Moral reasoning involves “reasoning from moral rules, principles, or standards and resolving conflicts among them, thereby placing limits on what one may do with a clear conscience (Barnet & Bedau 399). In other words does the decision you are making go against your own morals, principles, or standards.
There is so much we can do if people just invest the time and recognize how real this is. People don’t seem to understand or believe anything bad can come from texting until it actually happens to them. Then it’s too late but it doesn’t have to be. I’m no scholar or professional on highway safety but I do have common sense and I have been affected by this epidemic personally and that just puts fuel on the fire so I can save someone else from the pain it may bring. I lost a good friend of mine I known since I was middle school to texting and driving.
On the night of the celebration party of win a tragic accident occurred. In the crash Daniel Brennan was drunk driving and 2 people were killed while one was paralysed. The accident changed the lives of the people involved in the accident as well as the town of Mumbilli. The town was against the Brennan family and believes that Daniel should get a life long sentence. Daniel felt guilt and remorse while he was in jail and It was just a mistake that couldn’t be undone.
The current P-plate laws are extremely affective in reducing accidents on the road.This is because they deal with many of the dangers p-plate drivers face while driving, including distractions, driving speed, peer pressure and driver safety. To begin with, the current p-plate laws are affective in reducing accidents while driving because they deal with the important issue of distractions. An example of a distraction that is dealt with by the current p-plate laws is mobile phones. Mobile phones cannot be used by p-plate drivers when driving or while the car is moving or stopped but not parked. This helps to stop accidents because it removes distractions from a p-plate driver so they can focus solely on driving.
Automobile Searches: Automobile searches are considered warrantless searches. In Carroll v. United States (1925), federal agents searched a car for illegal alcohol. Because of the Carroll case, automobile searches were considered as warrantless search. Cars are obviously mobile, in which they can be driven away along with the evidence of anything illegal. If you were to get a search warrant, it will be too late.
The point of a driverless car is safety, but there are plenty of people who guess that self-driving cars are dangerous. Are they right or wrong? What may cause popularization of driverless cars in the future? What are security problems of driverless cars and how to solve them?
Why some states such as my own force the seatbelt law would but yet let several motor cycle riders drive down a road without a helmet? I have to say, it is ridiculous. Truthfully, I believe that a driver to a car should have to wear a helmet as well as a seatbelt and to be honest; I don’t see anything wrong with a motorcyclist also having to wear the helmet “By Law”. I know it would be somewhat dangerous for the motorcyclist to wear a seatbelt considering if the person driving was to have a accident, they are normally thrown in mid air and the bike may possibly fall down up on he or she. What I don’t understand is, if the laws are pushing people to wear a seatbelt in a car and because of what I had mentioned above about the motorcycle, why are they allowed on the road in the first place?
Do you want to be the cause of a fatal car accident while you walk away all fine and the other driver died because of you? No text is worth dying over cause of silly mistakes of the driver and the other drivers on the road who is texting. Texting while driving is like driving drunk. While, texting while driving causes fatal accidents it is also as dangerous as drinking while driving. “Writing text messages while driving is as dangerous as being considerably above the legal drink-drive limit, researchers have found.”-Andrew Hough Scientist and Researcher in UK (Hough).