Roy Batty defence summation

852 Words4 Pages
Many people here today are convinced that the Nexus-6 Replicant, Roy Batty, is an emotionally awkward Frankensteinian creature guilty of murder, or if you will, patricide. So far the prosecution has presented circumstantial evidence of which they can only accuse. The accusations of murder are, only that, accusations. Yes, Dr Eldon Tyrell did come to his premature death at the hands of Roy Batty, but this cannot be classified as murder. Before I delve into why Roy Batty is not guilty of such an allegation, I will need to inform you of a theory developed by Masahiro Mori, called the “Uncanny Valley”. The Uncanny Valley is an idea that humanoid robots show many visual anomalies similar to ones seen in corpses and therefore elicit the same instinctual response within humans, failing to evoke empathy required for productive human-robot interaction. How can Roy receive a fair trial if the jury is biased and suffering bouts of anthropormorphobia? Please, do your best to remain as fair-minded as possible during the trial. Roy Batty was designed to survive, fight and kill quickly with no remorse, intended for slave labour and made for exploitation. Replicants such as Roy Batty were imprisoned as a result of their mere existence as strict laws on humanoid positronic robots living on Earth were enforced. If the replicants were such a danger to humans, why were they created to be dangerous? Isaac Asimov’s “Three Laws of Robotics” were established after the ultimate fate of Dr Victor Frankenstein and his creature. The Three Laws being: 1. A robot must not harm a human being, or through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm 2. A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the first law 3. A robot must protect it’s own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second Law From then
Open Document