Roosevelt vs. Wilson

907 Words4 Pages
In the first two decades of the 20th century the political scene reflected a growing belief in the ideas of the Progressive movement. The movement encouraged fundamental social and economic reforms. Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson were both presidents during the Progressive Era, and in the election of 1912 they competed for the presidency. Both men saw the problems caused by industrialization and Big Business, but disagreed on the nature of these problems and the correct way of solving them. Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson espoused two different approaches to progressive reform. Roosevelt saw the benefits of increased efficiency brought on by Big Business but stressed the need to legislate against its abuse of power while Wilson saw all monopoly as inherently unproductive and stressed how important it was to be rid of it. Roosevelt, in his “New Nationalism”, emphasized the need for enhanced regulation and legislation to combat the evils of Big Business, while maintaining a cooperative tone. In his “Square Deal”, he written a plan for enforcing equality for all members of society, including both the small-time laborer and the big-time business executive. He pointed out that special interests were using their power to manipulate politics into misrepresenting the common will. He stressed the importance of getting rid of politics of this manipulation through measures such as prohibiting political contributions and corporations and implementation of the Australian ballot. Roosevelt also pointed out that the power of Big Business could be and was being misused to exploit the Little Man and stifle his advancement through society. He suggested that corporations and the people who run them be responsible for maintaining fully legal behavior and disclosing economic status to the public in order to prevent corruption. He also stressed that governments should

More about Roosevelt vs. Wilson

Open Document