Adrianne Scott Cwv-101 06/14/2015 Valerie De La Torre Benchmark assignment: ethical dilemma Sarah and her husband has been trying to have their first born for 5 years to discover their growing baby has tested positive for tay-sachs disease and down syndrome. Getting the heartbreaking news she started to think about abortion and rather or not it was the right thing to do to go forward with her pregnancy. Sarah and her husband has been trying to conceive for a very long time and there trying has turned into her finally getting her wish. Sarah thought if she aborted her child it would save her child from coming into this sinful world full of hate, pain, hurt and spare her child of suffering. Sarah contacted a close friend of hers to name Diana blue who is a pediatrician and is and atheist to receive some advice on her situation.
This had obviously been very difficult time and I was aware that the birth of a new baby within the family may have come with mixed emotions. SCENARIO Prior to the visit I had received a telephone handover from the new Mother’s midwife, who had explained this had been an uneventful pregnancy and straight forward delivery. However her sister had very recently given birth, which had tragically resulted in the baby dying shortly afterwards. The midwife explained this had created anxieties about her new baby and that whilst she appeared to doing okay it was something to be mindful of. This highlights again the importance of collaborative working and effective handovers ( ).
Out of love, his parents have made choices to not only protect Paul but to keep him shielded from decision-making knowledge of events, and subjects that they didn’t want him to be exposed to. While his parents may have thought their decisions were more positive then negative, they showed their lack of faith in Paul. They were shielding him from adult information and decisions. They were ultimately limiting his ability to grow-up. Mom made the first choice.
In the article selected, Couple Wins Suit, Doc Didn't Suggest Aborting Baby With Down Syndrome, the author, Rebecca Taylor, discusses a court case in Oregon in which Ariel and Deborah Levy filed a lawsuit against their doctor for failing to let them know that their daughter would be born with Down Syndrome. Taylor's subjectivity comes through in almost every word in type. Carefully chosen phrases such as "$2.9 million for saying you would have killed your child" (Taylor, 2012) leave no room for mistaking the authors opinions. Taylor communicates disdain for the subjects of her article in many ways. It is apparent what her personal beliefs are, even though they are never stated.
And if its religious and biblically homosexuality is forbidden it shouldn’t be legalized it’s going against our moral values and belief Introduction To begin, the civil and legal rights of individuals in married should be discussed. As we know marriage is a basic right of the people, so nobody can oppose and force someone to marry with someone else. This means that one can marry whomever he or she wishes. However I think that this rule does not apply for gay people, because when rules are made, it is usually based on real life, moral values, and natural law. Marriage is the most important social institution, and it is a formality for the perpetuation of procreation; hence same sex marriage cannot meet this requirement.
Dewey Dell was referring to her mother’s doctor Peabody. Dewey Dell had become pregnant by Lafe. She was in need of an abortion and she felt that Peabody could do this for her but she only has ten dollars. Dewey Dell is so afraid but desperate for the abortion. She is dealing with this problem basically on her own with no help from anyone.
When they are older they can go to conformation classes then later be confirmed. In ways this is good because the person gets to make choice into going to be a part of that faith and that church. In some ways it can be seen as a bad thing as it could be seen as pointless as the child has already been baptised so the child wouldn’t really have a say anyway. Orthodox These people baptise babies which in some ways is good because then the child is definitely going to be of that faith, but it can also be taken as a bad thing as it would not be the child’s choice on whether he definitely wants to be part of that religion. They are baptised by full immersion.
No matter what the circumstances surrounding conception an innocent life was created. It is the parent’s responsibility to protect the child. Pro Choice may never get the full support its supporters would like due to cultures and religious beliefs. Pro Choice is available to not pass judgment but to be a shoulder to lean on when there is no other. It is an option that provides quality care, privacy and responsibility for
That person or person’s direct family should make the decision to give “the gift of death, after having given him the gift of life” (Ganley) Said the mother of her severely disabled son named Humbert. She had planned on helping him in killing himself on the 3 years after the accident. He couldn’t move except for his left thumb, couldn’t speak or see. Humbert tried to adapt. He wrote a book called “I Ask You For The Right To Die” That wasn’t satisfying enough to him because he still wanted to die.
After having such a traumatizing childhood, she still found a way to overcome the obstacles and become a novelist. Soon after their mother died at such a young age, the three older sisters, Charlotte, Elizabeth, and Maria attended religious school. In one of Charlotte's novels she claims that abuse took place in the school. Emily enrolled a little bit later than her sisters did. When typhoid fever took over the school, Maria and Elizabeth caught it.