Pros And Cons Of Nazi Eugenics

1791 Words8 Pages
Running Head: Nazi Science Nazi Science: Good or Bad Science? Sonya Blanton Argosy University English 102 Composition 2 Professor Jaclyn King October 8, 2014 Nazi Science 2 Nazi Science during the Holocaust came about mainly by Germans murdering approximately six million Jews for experimental reasons. The Nazi doctors performed many experiments on patients also known as victims on the basis of ethnicity, disability, or if they were located in a prison or concentration camp, and these experiments were initially developed because they wanted to try and improve the survival of people. Not all the Nazi doctors during that time had bad intent and deserve to be labeled as “killers”. Most will argue that Nazi Science has no medical bearings…show more content…
A: The Nazi plan at first invigorated American enthusiasts. One eugenics group in California, for example, took it as evidence that America needed to go further in that area. But most Americans didn’t know that America sterilization laws existed. The statutes had been advanced by interest Group’s mainly doctors, asylum heads. The Nazi regime became more repressive, however, some experts in the US questioned the scientific basis for eugenics. There was an important 1936 report by the American Neurological Association that undercut its scientific legitimacy. The Nazi responded by telling the US, “You do this too, you were the eugenic leader and, by the way, you have lynching, racial segregation.” That accusation became anathema by the 1940’s. The Nazi doctors performed and developed experiments initially because they wanted to try and improve the survival of people, which is ethical. The unethical part is how they determined who would be utilized to carry out the experiments. To rule out all data collected and act as if it doesn’t exist is considered unethical in itself because the code of ethics a doctor has to follow strictly states that a doctor must perform all steps within their means to save a life or treat…show more content…
This is a condensed part of the code of ethics taken by medical professionals. Not all the Nazi doctors during that time had bad intentions or deserved to be labeled as “killers”. Some of them took mercy on many prisoners in a more indirect way. They would diagnose them with a less severe diagnosis than it really was, releasing patients to their families, or keeping them in university hospitals instead of sending them to state hospitals. These doctors were in a no-win situation because Hitler was ordering all people that fell in a certain category to be executed or become one of the Guinea pigs for the experiments. Hitler’s government was in control of the notorious acts committed by these doctors. The doctors could have said “NO” but they ran a risk of being killed or lose their privileges to practice. Many psychiatrists did not have the courage to openly oppose to the so-called, medical- killing project. So the question is, “Can this Science be considered GOOD Science?” The answer is yes, because to rule out the data collected and act as if it didn’t exist would be unethical because it offers authenticity of the experiments performed. Most will argue that Nazi Science has no medical bearings on today’s medical breakthroughs, but after reviewing the limited information in less than a handful of experiments a conclusion should be gathered to the instinct of even if the medical information was not used verbatim, or not at all, the current

More about Pros And Cons Of Nazi Eugenics

Open Document