Pros And Cons Of Fighting In Hockey

1243 Words5 Pages
Brayden Stamp Ms. Evans ENG 4U1 Final Copy Why Fighting in Hockey Should Stay There is no sporting event which brings a crowd to its feet, and creates an atmospheric explosion quite like that of an ice hockey fight. Many view ice hockey as teeming with brutality and unnecessary violence, and believe the stereotype that hockey players are nothing but goons who enjoy seeing their own blood. However, fighting within hockey is a form of sanctioned violence, and has been deemed acceptable since the inception of the NHL in 1917. A very recent political uproar has taken place within the hockey world, as more and more people in the hockey world are pushing to have fighting completely removed from the game. I have played hockey for 10 years; I…show more content…
For those who are not hockey fans, the stereotype is generally that hockey players fight each other for fun. This is not the case. Fighting within hockey has a very strict time and place for when it is considered acceptable by players and coaches. Former NHL player Ken Hammond described fighting as “a form of social control that has a moderating effect on the potentially serious unsanctioned violent acts between players”. Unsanctioned violent acts (a play that is deemed irresponsible and dangerous in a hockey game) come by way of striking an opponent with a hockey stick, or nasty attacks on an opponent such as hitting a player when he is not looking or from behind. A player may receive only a minor two minute penalty for these actions even though they could seriously injure the victim. Two minutes in a penalty box is a small price to pay when you consider that it could eliminate an opposing star player out of a game, so where is the justice? Players understand that allowing fighting is the best way to protect each other, as it plays the role of self-policing. Brian Burke, the Calgary Flames president, has become one of the many advocates for keeping fighting within the game. In January 2012, he stated “Players in the old days would protect themselves, then it evolved into players protecting their teammates, and now I’m not sure who is looking after them”. Thus, Burke eludes a central, albeit often ignored, aspect of the debate. As the rules against fighting become stricter, there is a far greater opportunity for players to commit unsanctioned violent acts with minimal consequences. This relates to the findings of Corriero in 2005 who found that fighting in hockey was almost exclusively dependent on either the situational factor, or environmental factor. The situational factor refers to the idea that there is a time and place, or in other words, a situation when it is deemed

More about Pros And Cons Of Fighting In Hockey

Open Document