Product Liability Lawsuit

1709 Words7 Pages
Product Liability Lawsuit Mattel was hit with lead paint class action suit on August 20, 2007.The suit, to be filed in Alameda County Superior Court under California's Proposition 65 law, would force manufacturers and retailers to adopt procedures for inspecting products to make sure they are safe. Barring that, they would be required to warn consumers that the items contained chemicals known to cause cancer or birth defects. Describe the company and the product safety issue that led to the lawsuit. On August 2, 2007, Mattel's Fisher-Price subsidiary recalled almost one million Chinese-made toys, including Dora the Explorer and Sesame Street toys, because of potential hazards from parts of the toys which were colored using lead-based paint that may have exceeded the US Federal limit of 600 parts per million. On August 14, 2007, Mattel recalled over 18 million products because it was possible that they could pose a danger to children due to the use of strong magnets that may detach. Strong small magnets could be dangerous to the children if two or more were ingested, attracting each other in the intestines and causing damage The California attorney general and Los Angeles city attorney said they would file a lawsuit today against Mattel Inc., Toys R Us Inc. and 18 other companies, accusing them of making or selling products that contain "unlawful quantities of lead." In November 19, 2007, Lifsher, M. and Goldman, A, writers of the Los Angeles Times wrote in the article titled Lead in toys sparks lawsuit. Mattel, the lead defendant in the lawsuit, said it welcomed the attorney general's involvement and added that it would be helpful for the entire toy industry. "Mattel expected this development and believes that the attorney general's assumption of this case will be beneficial to all parties," a spokeswoman for the El Segundo company said in a statement. "The

More about Product Liability Lawsuit

Open Document