Organizational Communication Analysis Paper

1158 Words5 Pages
Organizational Communication Analysis, Part I Carrie St. Jean COM/480 Mr. Michael Turner April 17, 2015 Kelsey Elementary School is the virtual organization I reviewed and selected for the Organizational Communication Analysis. As a mother of an intelligent kindergartner, I am always abreast of the communication efforts associated with the local elementary schools. In previous years, school administrators and teachers only communicated in person, through printed letters, or by a telephone conversation. The advancements of technology through the years provide school faculty the chance to connect with others using an abundance of communication methods, but the initial step to conducting an Organizational Communication Analysis is to cultivate…show more content…
It does not matter if individuals are at work or in school. They often spend a significant amount of working hours in groups (West & Turner, 2004). Faculty at the school is able to gather in small groups to either have lunch, discuss lesson plans, or discuss both favorable and unfavorable topics. Informal conversations are commonplace happening through hallway chats, online instant messaging, or while having a meal. As in every work environment, these information conversations can be productive but some are counterproductive because as in life, not everyone in the workplace environment will get…show more content…
These are differences in understanding, perception, attitudes, or preferred action. Yet one of the key advantages of working in groups and teams is the opportunity to capitalize on the multiple perspectives that group and team members have (Beebe & Masterson, 2006). An examination of the faculty profiles provided me with an indication that although there are some teachers with innovative ideas, many teachers carry a groupthink mentality. Groupthink is described as a means of deliberating what group members use when their desire for unanimity overrides their motivation to assess all available plans of action (West & Turner, 2004). Some student profiles created by faculty members contain information that could be called into question because of biases and stereotyping. Conclusion This report provides a descriptive framework of the Kelsey Elementary School. At first glance, the systems, faculty, and personal that are in place seem to function well. Further observation reveals that although there are good communication methods in place, there is room for improvement. There are several factors that lead to a breakdown in communications but there are many tools and exercises that can aide in the improvement of communication between staff members, teachers and students, administrators and faculty, and all others associated with Kelsey
Open Document