Group Dynamics Analysis

1440 Words6 Pages
The importance of this assignment is to evaluate group dynamics within the group that I was placed in during Psycho-social aspects of health, human interaction and communications seminar. Gibbs reflective cycle, Gibbs (1988) has been used throughout in order to effectively reflect upon key issues within group dynamics, Pears (2005) has also been used to assist with referencing correctly, knowing the importance of working well within a group/team in any healthcare setting, I was egger to enhance my skills in this area. The class was divided into groups, the group that I was placed in consisted of one midwife, and three adult nurse students including myself. At this point I was very nervous as I had never worked with any other healthcare professional…show more content…
A trigger is an action that sets off a course of events McKeown & Summers (2005). To begin with the team spoke about the trigger and what could effect his health and social issues surrounding his family life, this process is defined as brainstorming, Allen (2007). Brainstorming is a process of working out the 'how', there are several ways in which this can be achieved. For this particular exercise the group decided the best way forward would be to complete a spider diagram, for this we used the spider diagram outlined by Cottrell (2008). The group worked on the spider diagram together, this is where we identified the key issues surrounding the…show more content…
I myself took on the role of coordinator, this is a person that shows the relationship between ideas, I felt at ease in this role. I appeared to also take on the role of elaborator this meant that I was constantly undertaking the role of explaining and clarifying ideas. These roles together were overloading and put an enormous strain on me. Roles taken on by the other two members of the group were evaluator, energizer and orienter, roles within the groups were outlined by Borchers (1999)</ There was some communication network pitfalls Burtis & Turman (2006) during our time working with one another we spoke on a weekly basis and worked together for about three hours each time, it is my belief that this was not long enough for us to establish what working together as a team really meantThis has shown me that working within a team is an ongoing process and part of everyday life, we take on our roles in life with no apparent prompt, this indicates that there is no need to arrange people into their roles as this can happen on its own. Within this small team we all defined our own roles, with no discussion. In some groups there is role competition as outlined by Burtis & Turman (2006) in this particular group there

More about Group Dynamics Analysis

Open Document