Enron Summary Information

397 Words2 Pages
Enron Information 4/25/12 Called to Account In “Called to Account” the court case involving Arthur Andersen’s trial for its part in the Enron scandal. Arthur Anderson was the accounting firm that was auditing Enron for the year in which it falsified its financial statements to appear profitable in years that it was really taking losses. Nancy Temple, Andersen’s lawyer was one of the main culprits in the scandal being that she tried to cover up and hide things from the SEC. The article also brought to realization that the incident was so bad in the eye of the public that Arthur Andersen would most likely no longer exist. Thomas, Cathy Booth. "Called to Account." Time. Time, 18 June 2002. Web. 25 Apr. 2012. <http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,263006,00.html>. Lay, Skilling guilty on nearly all accounts In the msnbc.com article “Lay, Skilling guilty on nearly all accounts”, the trial and verdict of Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling are portrayed. Approximately five years after the collapse of Enron, the verdict was reached in a Houston courtroom. Lay and Skilling were guilty on many charges such as conspiracy, insider trading, and falsifying financial reports. The article provides a detailed account of their reactions to the verdict. They both took it differently, one with shock, and the other knowing the system would win. "Lay, Skilling Guilty on Nearly All Counts." Msnbc.com. Msnbc Digital Network, 25 May 2006. Web. 25 Apr. 2012. <http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12968481/ns/business-corporate_scandals/t/lay-skilling-guilty-nearly-all-counts/>. White House pressed for more Enron details Before the crisis at Enron was revealed to the public in the form of bankruptcy, the company had met with the white house several times. One of those times was only six days before declaring bankruptcy. This received must criticism and scrutiny
Open Document