The former employee, Pelvas, complained to the EEOC that the mandatory services are in conflict with his beliefs. One of the defenses that Townley used was the “undue hardship” if they accommodate religious beliefs of Pelvas, which would excuse him from attending the religious services. Townley lost in this argument because the court did not see undue hardship happening for the company if they not allow Pelvas to attend the services. For our situation, we can win in this case because our claim of undue hardship is valid, unlike the Townley’s. We needed this shift change because of business necessity.
In my opinion, George should intervene the unsafe act instead of taking the order from Paul. The main factor that may stop him from doing the right thing is losing his job. George is a romantic person and he need the high wage to remain his romantic life with his girlfriend and his car. Therefore it is kind of hard for him to resist the order. However, stopping the act is the right thing to do.
Overall, I think filling the safety complaints was a great choice and that he did the right thing in doing that. The company violated OSHA and didn't take the complaints seriously. They also violated the employee by not acting on a serious issue. The courts verdict would reflect my job in this case because I would feel as If I didn't protect the employee and that I could of prevented the lawsuit. If I were a human resource manager, I would be ashamed and I would feel like I didn't do my job, and that I just ignored a safety issue that was serious.
Both characters are guilty of focalism which leads to an escalation of conflict and poor decision making. The captain's focalism is deeply rooted in overconfidence bias. Bazerman explains overconfidence bias as "too sure that we know the right answer, we become impervious to new evidence or alternate perspectives" (37). In the original message, the captain was given orders that he plans to follow; therefore, he searches for confirming rather than disconfirming evidence as to the actions he should take. He has more experience than the executive officer, so when questioned by the X-O he replies "I don't need to think this over."
Mr. B. was vulnerable when he was left unattended. Finally, the LPN on duty displayed a dangerous knowledge deficit by ignoring the de-saturation alarm on the oximeter. Improvement Plan Using Change Theory Change theory helps to effectively organize ideas that bring about long-term change. Implementing change theory first requires an identified driving force. In the scenario, Emergency department staff members were likely shaken by this poor outcome of Mr. B., and would be motivated to change to a safer model just to avoid a repeat in the future.
When management becomes aware of issues that need to be dealt with they need to address them ethically because at the end of the day your ethical reputation is something that is once tarnished is hard to overcome. Not to mention they have the social and ethical responsibility to correctly handle issue of this type and not sweep them under the rug. When you ignore or comprise your ethics, you begin a long and dark journey down a road that is hard to come back from. Decisions of this caliber will not only affect you individually but they will also affect your business decisions and compromise your reputation. One of the things that have stood out in Dalman’s and Lei’s management of Sandwich Blitz is their integrity both in
The main purpose of this article is to discuss the Caux Round Table (CRT) Principles for Responsible Business which has described moral standards for suitable behavior in the workplace. Breaks in company honesty, whether among a small amount or a lot of individuals, compromise the beliefs of workers and for this reason the ability of an organization to provide people’s needs. The main idea of the article is to determine a universal code of ethics in the CRT and talk about the standards for behavior in the workplace. The most important information in this article is the principles themselves and the similarities and/or differences to Jerry White’s Biblical guidelines. The first principle of CRT is to respect stakeholder beyond shareholders
The warhead cable dilemma case discusses the moral dilemma an employee faces in a work environment when the employee has received an unethical direction from the management. This case looks at the effect of an unethical behavior of upper management on employees. Mr. Stanton should approach the situation by wearing a hat of socially responsible person. Out of the 10 warhead cables that were tested, two were found to be defective (Lawrence & Weber, 2011). He should put a HOLD on the current batch so that it is not released to the customer.
Analysis of Ethical Dilemma PSY/610 Introduction It is important for psychologists and other professionals to demonstrate ethical behavior when working with clients/patients, students, and colleagues. Unfortunately ethical behavior is not always applied in situations where it is appropriate and as a result those individuals on the receiving end are treated unfairly. This paper will attempt to confront a situation where two graduate assistants are receiving unethical treatment from a researcher who is currently leading the three studies they are working on. This paper will include ethical considerations for the scenario and notate the ethical violations made on the behalf of the senior researcher. Ethical Considerations Thinking before we act or speak is crucial while in the workplace.
In consideration of the issue, the conflict of interest arises between the wish of the customers to use an application without advertising and the wish of businesses to have an opportunity to use the messenger for their marketing needs and sending advertisements. According to some considerations, the conflict of interests might appear useful for the company. However, in most cases, the conflict of interest “undermines trust” and ultimately tends to reduce the revenue (Lawrence & Weber 101). Nevertheless, with reference to the rights method of ethical reasoning and the identification of the right for privacy as the core human right, privacy of the users should be a primary concern of WhatsApp managers. Besides, identification of the right to privacy as the fundamental human rights supported by both international and national law systems, keeping privacy is the primary task of the company (Rotenberg).