The fact that companies are hiring celebration assistants and dishing out confetti and kudos, has helped with job retention and self esteem at work. However, could it be that a generation raised to value one's self esteem over all virtues would not end up being more narcissistic than generations before(Scenters-Zapico)? There are even seminars developed to help our professors with supportive criticism. “We were told to throw away our red pens so we don’t intimidate students,” stated Professor Sloop, Professor at Vanderbilt University (Scenters-Zapico). Because of this many teachers and
They will absorb the blame on themselves, and the whole department. Finger pointing goes back to grade school. Problems could also show issues within the department which the boss should be taking responsibility for, and the blame stops here. A good boss does not mind rolling up their sleeves and getting their hands dirty, and help their employees when deadlines occur, they are an excellent boss. A good boss truly understands that unless the job is done, and done by all, they have not done their job.
A good boss makes sure you have the correct hours on your paycheck. A bad boss will hassle you for every little thing that you do. A bad boss will hire you just because he/she has the authority to do so. A bad boss will not give you a chance to succeed into the company and take all the credit for them. I was in a recent situation with a good boss vs. a bad boss.
Heimmediately fired his assistant because he believed this individual was not being careful in checking the delivery date before signing for the doors. The problem disappeared. The doors began arriving on time. Rotor was congratulated for a job well done. With the problem being solved (or so he thought), he and his new assistant began installing again.
However, his colleagues, such as Harold Singer from the engineering department were puzzled by the assembly room’s success. Even the President of ARC, Frank Halbert thought the assembly room was not a tough place to handle after all. In my opinion, although Langley still needed to improve his external focus and enhance controls, he was able to bond a group of “oddballs” together and turned them into productive and cost-saving workers and made the business profitable. It was his emphasis on human relations style and internal focus that lead him and the assembly room to success. In this analysis, I’ll use Quinn’s competing values model and eight managerial leadership roles as the framework to evaluate Ralph Langley’s strength and weakness, and his approach to organization effectiveness.
This created confusion of reporting responsibilities, political tension, and reluctance to take responsibility and action. To address the main problem Erik Peterson is inexperienced and this shows in his incapacity to handle various situations in the case. He lacks the support of the upper management (Jenkins and Hardy), and does not reach out for help among his peers( Green,Cantor) He also has to face insubordination,Curt Andrew being the prime accused in this case. He also faces the Turn on Deadline 1) Lack of communication from frontline workers to Curt Andrews (and thus Erik) in providing tower building status, updates, or needs. Erik seems hampered at quickly knowing exactly where the 21 towers stand.
INTRODUCTION This case is about the unethical decisions and activities that are instructed by Phil Bailey, supervisor of Empress Luxury Line. The case also describes the ethical decision that is taken by Kevin and his refusal to follow an unethical decision of his supervisor Phil Bailey by denying making fraud with the insurance adjustor. This report will highlight the ethical dilemma faced by Antonio during following unethical orders of his superiors. Additionally, from the point of view of Antonio suitable and effective strategy will be also suggested that will be beneficial for the organization and for the employees without compromising their ethics. 1) Analyze the ethical dilemma faced by Antonio In the case, when Phil Bailey told to Kevin to charge high amount of money over the insurance company for the damage of wires and computer circuits, Kevin disagreed to do this unethical activity due to having high morality and standards.
I think that an organization should be very open in their decision so employees do not get shocked when they get laid off. After all some companies need to outsource to being able to compete and keep a sustainable competitive advantage towards their competitors. Do you agree with some politicians that we need laws to limit offshore outsourcing? The idea of passing laws to limit offshore outsourcing I think is a good idea as long as they are only applied to government contractors. Other companies need the opportunity to outsource to being able to compete.
What should the court decide? Why? > Background check is very important before hiring an employee because it presents the potential liability of employers for the harmful acts of the people they hire. Employers are generally responsible for the actions of their agents so they should avoid negligent hiring. If an employer fails to meet its duty to conduct an adequate background check and hires an unfit employee who uses his or her position to inflict harm on others, that employer may be liable for negligent hiring.
We believe that both the employee and the employer were unethical in this case because it illustrates a degree of moral intensity. The employee had a due diligence to the employer and should have brought his concerns to higher management instead of blogging it on a low profile under a false name. The employer had a due diligence to the employee and should have expressed their concern to the employee. The employer could of asked the employee if he could have deleted the blog or edit it so that the name of the employer was not mentioned. The degree of harm that could have happened to the company was not justified because when a search was made in an Internet search and the blog was not easily accessible in the public domain and this does not give the employer the just cause for termination of the employee.