Although not extremely appealing, it contains worthwhile information surrounding the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the nation’s history. The arguments were persuasive and well researched. The authors know what they are doing and make sure this is observable in all aspects of their writing. As such, this is a rather effective book in the argument for the separation of church and state. Works
The rationale for the code of ethics design is present, but incomplete or seriously flawed. Supportive research is not present or is inappropriate. The rationale for the code of ethics design is complete, but may be somewhat flawed. It is supported by little or antiquated scholarly research. The rationale for the code of ethics design is thorough and well reasoned.
Your ability to think through a project makes you a good short-term planner; you can identify the roles, resources, and time lines needed to complete a project successfully. Your search for results leads you to be highly self-reliant, rather than to depend on others to achieve the quality your want. (2008, Alessandra) In my assessment it is stated that people in the steadiness styles like a slower-pace and are focused on relationships, are open and indirect, unassertive, warm and reliable. They are considered by others as compliant, soft-hearted and acquiescent. (2008, Alessandra) I agree with most of this portion of the assessment I do prefer a slower-pace and focus on relationships.
Discussion/analysis generally reflects adequate understanding of principles presented in course readings/materials. Where relevant, discussion/analysis employs proper APA style. Length limitations and other form/format requirements (if any) are generally followed.
In A Separate Peace by John Knowles there were many things I liked. I really liked the character of Gene, the setting, the diction, and the storyline. I really liked Gene. Even though, he wasn’t the most spectacular character, he was my favorite. His personality was just really entertaining.
Academic dishonesty is the participation or collaboration in specific prohibited forms of conduct.” Academic dishonesty includes the following: * Registering for a course not approved by a student advisor; * Unauthorized copying, collaboration, or use of notes, books, or other materials on examinations or other academic exercises; * Plagiarism, which is defined as the intentional representation of another person’s work, words, thoughts, or ideas, including material from the Internet as one’s own; * Unauthorized possession of any academic material, such as tests, research papers, assignments, or similar materials; or * Furnishing false information with the intent to deceive members of the college faculty or administration who are acting in the exercise of their official duties. Please consult the catalog for information on penalties for violation of the Academic Honesty policy. Please note that as the Catalog and Student Handbook is updated, campus policies may
The connection between critical thinking and ethics is that there are no general hard and fast rules regarding the application of ethics in various situations, which is especially pertinent considering the fact that what may be ethical in one situation may be considered unethical in another context. I use my reasoning skills (rationality) to determine both the universal rules that each person should follow (autonomy)and the process that will assure fairness and justice for all in the community. My blind spot my belief that motive justifies method or overconfidence in process. I believe that a consistent process results in a just outcome for all, I sometimes trust the process too much. Ethics plays a very important role in a professional setting.
Knowingly submitting another person’s work as your own, without properly citing the source of the work, is considered plagiarism. This will result in an unsatisfactory grade for the work submitted or for the entire course. It may also result in academic dismissal from the University. | | | |BTM7104-8 |Dr. Claude Superville | | | | |Statistics I |Activity 3-Normal Distribution and Probability Theory | | |
It not only effects you, but everyone else as well. When you plagiarize, you are stealing ideas from someone else and claiming them as your own. Not only is this dishonest, but you aren’t doing the work yourself and learning anything. This effects the person that you are stealing from and taking away the credit that they deserve for original work. As (Aurich 2012) states “Academic cheating is a real threat to the sanctity, integrity, and value of higher education,” (pg.
The work study program can be put at risk because of the need to minimize accessibility to unauthorized material. This risk could prevent administrators from allowing students to work in offices of administration. Her actions also could jeopardize the reputation and integrity of the university, by bringing embarrassment and disgrace to the school and surrounding community. A lack of trust between the faculty and student body could be an unintentional consequence of this breach of policy. The school could also face the loss of accreditations and academic standing which could ultimately jeopardize school funding, faculty jobs, extra circular activities and student programs.